Bill would vanquish 'zombie' directors
TORONTO • The federal government has taken a concrete step towards killing off “zombie” directors — board members who can remain with corporations despite receiving support from fewer than half the shareholders.
A bill tabled in Parliament Wednesday will require public companies governed by the Canada Business Corporations Act to have majority voting for directors. Under the legislation, shareholders would be given the option of voting for or against a director, rather than the current standard where votes are either made in favour or withheld.
In the absence of a majority- voting requirement, a director in an uncontested election simply needs one vote in favour to be elected.
The amendments to the Act would also require all federally registered public companies to disclose the gender composition of their boards and senior management, and their diversity policies.
Those amendments are intended to increase diversity and the representation of women on corporate boards and in senior management.
The Canadian Coalition for Good Governance ( CCGG), whose members include many of the country’s largest pension funds and money managers, has been pushing for more than 10 years for a law to require majority voting for directors.
At the same time, the coalition, which seeks to give shareholders a greater voice at the corporations they own, lobbied the Toronto Stock Exchange. In 2014, Canada’s main exchange began requiring all TSX- listed companies — except those that are majority-controlled — to adopt majority-voting provisions that require directors to tender their resignations immediately if less than 50 per cent of the votes are cast in their favour.
However, there are limitations, which have been criticized by some experts, including a provision that allows a board to reject the resignation of a director if there are “exceptional” circumstances that require his or her continued participation.
These board members have been termed “zombie” directors by governance professionals because of their ability to carry on after being defeated in a majority vote.
In a report compiled last November, law firm Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP found only one director had resigned within 90 days of a failed vote, while nine others were permitted to remain on their boards despite have failed to win majority support from shareholders.
In one example cited by the Davies report, five of seven directors at Spyglass Resources Corp. were rejected by a majority of shareholders, but they were kept on after the board’s governance, human resources, and compensation committee said losing them as the company was commencing substantial investments during a severe downturn in the oil and gas industry would ultimately harm the firm and its shareholders. One director was able to resign at his request.
Stephen Erlichman, executive director of the CCGG, said his group hopes provincial legislators follow Ottawa’s lead this week, and amend their own statutes so all public companies across Canada will have the new higher standard.
“When these amendments are enacted, the federal government will have made many of the important changes required to bring Canada’s federal corporate laws to ‘ best in class’ global standards,” Erlichman said.
The new bill, tabled in the House of Commons by Innovation, Science, and Economic Development Minister Navdeep Bains, would also require votes for individual directors, rather than slate voting in which all directors are either elected or defeated in a single vote.
“The bill introduces amendments that will increase shareholder democracy and participation, support the push to increase women’s participation on corporate boards and in senior management, and improve corporate transparency,” the ministry said.