National Post

U.K. SUPREME COURT DECISION COULD DELAY BREXIT.

Exit from EU could be delayed ECONOMY

- DANICA KIRKA

L ONDON • Britain’s government warned l awmakers not to try to “thwart the will of the people” after the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that Prime Minister Theresa May must seek the approval of Parliament before starting the formal process of leaving the European Union.

The 8- 3 decision forces the government to put a bill before Parliament, giving members of the House of Commons and the unelected House of Lords the chance to debate and potentiall­y offer amendments that could soften the terms of Britain’s exit from the EU, known as Brexit.

While the government insisted its timetable of starting the talks by the end of March remained on track, some analysts warned that a defeat i n the House of Lords, where May does not have a majority, could delay the process by a year or more.

“Parliament will rightly scrutinize and debate this legislatio­n,” David Davis, t he government’s Brexit secretary, told the House of Commons after the ruling. “But I trust no one will seek to make it a vehicle for attempts to thwart the will of the people, or frustrate or delay the process of our exit from the European Union.”

While the ruling won’t scuttle Britain’s departure, mandated by voters in a June 23 referendum, it once again highlights the uncertaint­ies in negotiatin­g the country’s future relationsh­ip with the bloc of 500 million people, which is central to trade, immigratio­n and security. The pound has fallen about 20 per cent against the U. S. dollar since the vote on concern about slower economic growth and reduced investment.

May’s government fought hard to avoid putting the matter before Parliament, in part because amendments to the legislatio­n could delay her timetable and force her into complicate­d concession­s with her own lawmakers before she even sat across the table before the other 27 members of the EU.

“Unfortunat­ely for businesses and other institutio­ns, Brexit still means uncertaint­y,” said Phillip Souta, head of U.K. public policy at the law firm Clifford Chance. “Parliament remains divided and the outcome of the negotiatio­ns remains unknown.”

Putting the issue before Parliament is not a simple matter. While May holds sway in the House of Commons, the House of Lords has in recent years stalled dozens of pieces of legislatio­n with which they disagreed, i ncluding an attempt by May’s predecesso­r to impose welfare cuts on the vulnerable. The government backed down after the delay.

“Defeat in the House of Lords would not stop Brexit from happening, but it could delay it until mid- 2020,” Souta said.

The l awsuit was considered the most important constituti­onal case in a generation because it centred on the question of who ultimately wields power in Britain’s system of government: the prime minister and her cabinet, or Parliament.

May had said she would use centuries- old powers known as Royal prerogativ­e to invoke Article 50 of the EU treaty and launch two years of exit talks. The powers — traditiona­lly held by the monarch — permit decisions about treaties and other specific issues to be made without a vote of Parliament.

The prime minister argued that the referendum gave her a mandate to take Britain out of the 28- nation bloc and that discussing the details of her strategy with Parliament would weaken the government’s negotiatin­g position.

Financial entreprene­ur Gina Miller sued to force the government to seek parliament­ary approval. Leaving the EU, she said, would change the fundamenta­l rights of citizens and this can’t be done without a vote of lawmakers. The Supreme Court agreed.

“The referendum is of great political significan­ce, but the act of Parliament which establishe­d it did not say what should happen as a result, so any change in the law to give effect to the referendum must be made in the only way permitted by the U.K. constituti­on, namely by an act of Parliament,” Supreme Court president David Neuberger said in reading the decision.

“To proceed otherwise would be a breach of settled constituti­onal principles stretching back many centuries,” he said.

OUTCOME OF THE NEGOTIATIO­NS REMAINS UNKNOWN.

 ?? JUSTIN TALLIS / AFP / GETTY IMAGES FILES ?? The Brexit lawsuit was considered the most important constituti­onal case in a generation because it centred on the question of who ultimately wields power in Britain.
JUSTIN TALLIS / AFP / GETTY IMAGES FILES The Brexit lawsuit was considered the most important constituti­onal case in a generation because it centred on the question of who ultimately wields power in Britain.
 ??  ?? Theresa May
Theresa May

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada