National Post

Analysts stay patient on Aritzia

- Off the Record Barry Critchley Financial Post

Less than four months after Aritzia Inc. raised $ 460 million in its initial public offering and a mere two weeks after it closed a $382-million secondary offering, the second week of February will be remembered for a more dubious achievemen­t.

In that week, the share price of the company that describes itself as “an innovative design house and fashion retailer of exclusive brands” traded below $16 for the first time. In Aritzia’s time as a public company, $16 has some significan­ce.

It was the price at which company sold subordinat­e voting shares in its IPO, the proceeds of which flowed to the selling shareholde­rs. In other words, the company got none of the proceeds.

Initially the plan was to sell 20 million shares with each share priced in the $14$ 16 a share range. Later the offer was upped to 25 million shares priced at $16, the top end of the range. One of those buyers, according to a filing, was Boston- based Fidelity which acquired almost 4.2 million shares — enough for a 13.21 per cent stake.

Toss in the 15 per cent over- allotment option — which was exercised — and the selling shareholde­rs pocketed $ 460 million in gross proceeds. For the foll owing three weeks, the shares traded above $ 18 — though volume, apart from the first day of trading when 1.5 million shares changed hands, was not that excessive. At year-end, the shares closed at $ 17.50 — meaning those who bought in the IPO were ahead while those who bought in the secondary market were probably under water.

Things remained normal until Jan. 9 when Aritzia reported its “strong” third quarter financials. Two days later, or about three months after its IPO closed, the company announced a $382 million secondary offering to be done via a bought deal. In that issue, the selling shareholde­rs would pocket $350.7 million and the employees the rest.

It’s not the norm for a company to issue new stock so soon after completing either an IPO or a normal equity offering. Indeed in the final prospectus for its IPO under the section “Lock- Up Arrangemen­ts,” Aritzia’s directors and executive officers, and the selling shareholde­rs agreed they would not sell any additional shares for 180 days — “without the prior written consent of the joint book-runners.”

So with permission granted, CIBC Capital Markets, Bank of America Merrill Lynch and TD Securities lobbed in a bought deal offer, which was accepted. The shares would resold at $17.45. At the time the shares were trading at $17.995.

For whatever reason — the large size, the relatively high price, the lack of a sufficient discount or the lack of time after the previous issue — the market didn’t like the deal and the shares embarked on a steady price decline. On Tuesday they closed below $16.

That decline has continued after the syndicate was forced to reprice the latest offering. A few days after the offering closed, the unsold stock was re- priced and found a home.

So what’s next? If the eight analysts who follow Aritzia are correct, the situation is a buying opportunit­y. All eight rate the company a buy and have posted one-year targets in the $22-$26 a share range.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada