Delays blamed in justice logjam
MONTREAL• During the summers of 2015 and 2016, McGill University professor Jason Carmichael tried to study what factors influenced sentencing outcomes for people convicted of drunk driving — but he ran into a problem.
The researchers he sent to the Montreal courthouse couldn’t track those criminal cases within a reasonable — and cost- efficient — time frame because of consistent delays.
“Every day, one out of five cases scheduled would actually take place — and even that one would get postponed,” Carmichael says in an incredulous tone. “It was one of the most dysfunctional things I have ever heard of in my life.”
Quebec recently announced $175 million over four years in funding for more judges, Crown attorneys and support staff to help alleviate the overburdened system.
But for Carmichael and other players in the industry who spoke to The Canadian Press, money alone is not the answer.
There is a culture of delay, they explain, that runs through all the actors in the system, from beat cops to attorneys to politicians who create new policies without providing the funding to implement them.
Courts across the country have been overburdened for years and the problem intensified after a Supreme Court ruling last July aimed at respecting the fundamental right of an accused to be tried within a reasonable period.
In a 5-4 decision, the court decided provincial court criminal cases cannot exceed 18 months from the moment a suspect is charged until the end of that person’s trial.
At the Superior Court level, the ceiling was set at 30 months. Only delays initiated by the state count toward the caps, meaning delays sought by defence lawyers are not factored in.
Provinces have had to scramble to adhere to the Supreme Court ruling.
In Manitoba, for example, its three chief justices and attorney general recently suggested a pilot project that would eliminate preliminary inquiries so cases can move straight to trial.
Crown officials in Quebec note that since last summer’s ruling, lawyers in 574 cases have requested that charges be stayed against their clients due to unduly lengthy proceedings.