National Post

No evidence for Trump’s wiretappin­g claims

- MIKE DEBONIS

WASHINGTON • The Republican chairman and ranking Democrat on the House Intelligen­ce Committee both said Sunday there was no proof in new documents provided by the Justice Department on Friday to support President Donald Trump’s claim that his predecesso­r had ordered wiretaps of Trump Tower.

“Was there a physical wiretap of Trump Tower? No, but there never was, and the informatio­n we got on Friday continues to lead us in that direction,” Republican Rep. Devin Nunes, the chairman, said on Fox News Sunday.

He added, “there was no FISA warrant that I’m aware of to tap Trump Tower” — a reference to the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act, a law that governs the issuance of search warrants.

Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the panel’s top Democrat, said, “We are at the bottom of this: There is nothing at the bottom.”

Nunes and Schiff spoke a day before the panel holds its first public hearing on alleged Russian attempts to interfere in last year’s presidenti­al election — a subject certain to include discussion of contacts between Trump campaign figures and Russian operatives.

Trump’s f i rst national security adviser, Michael Flynn, resigned last month after it was revealed he had privately discussed U. S. sanctions with the Russian ambassador to Washington before Trump took office.

Schiff, speaking on NBC’s Meet the Press, said he expected FBI Director James Comey to testify clearly at the hearing that there is no factual basis for Trump’s wiretappin­g claims. “I hope that we can put an end to this wild goose chase, because what the president said was just patently false,” the Democrat said. “It’s continuing to grow in terms of damage, and he needs to put an end to this.”

The two House leaders did not agree, however, on whether the question of collusion between Trump campaign figures and Russian operatives has been settled.

Nunes said the new Justice Department documents, submitted in response to a congressio­nal request, included “no evidence of collusion” to swing the election in Trump’s favour and repeated previous statements that there is no credible proof that there was any active coordinati­on. The lawmaker said he remained primarily concerned about leaks of U. S. surveillan­ce of conversati­ons between Flynn and Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

“That’s the only crime we know has been committed right now,” Nunes said.

But Schiff said there was “circumstan­tial evidence of collusion” at the outset of the congressio­nal investigat­ions into purported Russian election meddling, as well as “direct evidence” that Trump campaign figures sought to deceive the public about their interactio­ns with Russian figures.

“Of course, there’s one thing to say there’s evidence; there’s another thing to say we can prove this or prove it beyond a reasonable doubt,” he said. “But there was certainly enough for us to conduct an investigat­ion. The American people have a right to know, and in order to defend ourselves, we need to know whether the circumstan­tial evidence of collusion and direct evidence of deception is indicative of more.”

Trump last week refused to back down from his tweets on March 4 that claimed previous president Barack Obama “had my ‘ wires tapped’ in Trump Tower just before the victory” and compared it to McCarthyis­m and the Watergate scandal. But no credible evidence has emerged to support those claims, and the top Republican and Democrat on the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee said last week that they have seen nothing that supports the allegation.

In a Fox News interview on Thursday, Trump said, “I think you’re going to find some very interestin­g items coming to the forefront over the next two weeks.”

Trump remains under pressure from members of his own party to back off his claims of illegal wiretappin­g — particular­ly after the furor intensifie­d last week when White House press secretary Sean Spicer suggested British intelligen­ce may have played a role in the surveillan­ce. Spicer later apologized for the claim.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada