National Post

The NHL needs to erase its double standard,

‘PLAYOFF HOCKEY’ COSTS PITTSBURGH ITS STAR

- in Toronto Michael Traikos mtraikos@postmedia.com Twitter.com/Michael_ Traikos

Because it’s the Cup.

That old NHL marketing campaign, which featured players battling through adversity, injuries and insurmount­able obstacles on their way to winning a championsh­ip, is one way of explaining what happened to Sidney Crosby in Monday’s game against the Washington Capitals.

Playoff hockey is high- stakes hockey. It’s violent, aggressive and sometimes dirty. It’s both ugly and beautiful. It’s putting away the whistles and letting them play.

It’ s Scott Stevens literally knocking Paul Kariya out cold with an open- ice hit, only to have Kariya come back and score the game-winner. It’s Claude Lemieux ramming Kris Draper’s face into the dasher boards or Nathan Horton being stretchere­d off the ice in the final. It’s everything you love and everything you hate about the sport rolled into one.

So when Alex Ovechkin swung his stick at Crosby’s head as if it were a baseball in the opening minutes of Game 3 and then Matt Niskanen followed it up by crosscheck­ing the Pittsburgh Penguins captain in the face as he was falling to the ice, it wasn’t surprising some simply shrugged their shoulders and defended it as a “hockey play.” After all, this was playoff hockey. That means concussion­s — like the one that potentiall­y has knocked Crosby out of the postseason — are part of the game. Was it dirty? Well, according to Capitals head coach Barry Trotz, it depends on what team you’re on.

“It’s like a car accident,” Trotz told reporters. “You have your side how it happened and the other person will have his side. I mean, it’s perspectiv­e.”

Yes, but why do the playoffs have to become a demolition derby? Why do they have to be called differentl­y than the regular season? Why do they have to turn into The Hunger Games?

It shouldn’t matter if you’re a Capitals fan or a Penguins fan. We all lose in a scenario where the best player in the world is once again sitting in a dark room. It sucks that we won’t get to see Crosby versus Ovechkin, each trying to outscore the other. Instead of watching highlight- reel goals over and over again, we’re dissecting super- slo- mo replays of a player taking a pair of sticks to the head. That’s just brutal.

Hockey is a physical sport in which injuries are often unavoidabl­e. But while this might have been accidental, it was also preventabl­e. Blame the players for not respecting one another, but it’s the league that has to do a better job of protecting its talent — something that obviously isn’t happening, based on the fact Ovechkin didn’t even receive a penalty on the play.

Can you imagine LeBron James dodging punches on his way to the rim? Or worse, taking that level of abuse and not even getting to shoot a free throw?

Only hockey makes its star players run through a gauntlet of slashes and cheap hits every time they touch the puck in the postseason. Only hockey seems to have two rule books: one for the regular season and a much- thinner version, which only really serves as a guideline, for the playoffs.

Apparently, Crosby should have known what he was signing up for when he drove to the net. He should have known players were more interested in taking him out than taking the puck. You want to see skill? Go watch figure skating.

It’s not just Crosby. And it’s not just this series or this year’s playoffs. A year ago, it was Kris Letang who delivered a headshot on Marcus Johansson. A week ago, Predators forward Kevin Fiala had his leg broken after Blues defenceman Robert Bortuzzo drove him needlessly into the end boards in Game 1. In the first round, Ovechkin nearly had his knee blown out after receiving a low-bridge hit from Toronto’s Nazem Kadri.

Don Cherry called it a “beauty” hip check. Who knows, maybe he will call Ovechkin’s slash a “beauty” backcheck.

The thing is Ovechkin’s play wasn’t even dirty, according to officials. A total of 37 minutes in penalties were called in Game 3, including a five- minute major to Niskanen for cross- checking. There could have been 37 more. And yet Ovechkin’s slash wasn’t one of them.

I’m not going to say what Ovechkin or Niskanen did was malicious or intentiona­l. I don’t believe Trotz put a bounty on Crosby’s head or that the Capitals were purposely trying to take the best player on the ice out of the game. To those who do, please log off Twitter. At the same time, call the game. Everyone knew the Capitals were going to have to raise their intensity level and do something to get back into a best- of- seven series they trailed 2- 0. Reputation­s are at stake and not just for Ovechkin — who has been criticized unfairly as a player who cannot raise his level of play in the playoffs — but for the entire Capitals team.

Maybe, like Kariya, Crosby will return and play the hero once more. Maybe, like Bobby Clarke with his slash on Valeri Kharlamov in the 1972 Summit Series, this will be remembered as the time when Ovechkin finally was willing to do whatever it took to win a Cup.

Either way, it seems like the NHL has another defining moment for its marketing campaign.

 ?? GENE J. PUSKAR / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? The Game 3 cross- check delivered by Washington Capitals defenceman Matt Niskanen to the face of Pittsburgh Penguins captain Sidney Crosby might have brought a premature end to the season for the game’s best player.
GENE J. PUSKAR / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS The Game 3 cross- check delivered by Washington Capitals defenceman Matt Niskanen to the face of Pittsburgh Penguins captain Sidney Crosby might have brought a premature end to the season for the game’s best player.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada