Boeing and Bombardier clash in court over subsidy allegations.
U.S. panel probes subsidy allegations
WA S HI NGTON • The next potential Canada- U. S. trade dispute unfolded Thursday as aerospace giants clashed at a Washington hearing that marked the formal launch of investigations into Boeing Co.’ s allegations that Bombardier Inc. received subsidies allowing it to sell its CSeries planes at belowmarket prices.
“The U. S. market is the most open in the world, but we must take action if our rules are being broken,” U. S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said in a statement after the hearing began. “While assuring the case is decided strictly on a full and fair assessment of the facts, we will do everything in our power to stand up for American companies and their workers.”
U. S. aeronautics powerhouse Boeing argued at the hearing that duties should be imposed on Bombardier aircraft, insisting its smaller Montreal- based rival receives government subsidies that give it an illicit toehold in the international market.
Bombardier has made it clear that its goal is to grab half the international market share for 100- to 150-seat aircraft, according to Boeing, which argues its rival has received an unfair head- start from Canadian taxpayers.
Boeing vice-president Raymond Conner said the sale of cheap, subsidized planes to Delta Air Lines helped Bombardier to enter a new market. If Bombardier reaches its stated goal, he said, it would squeeze Boeing from that market and cost the company US$ 330 million a year in sales.
“Today we are at a critical moment,” Conner told the seven- member U. S. International Trade Commission. “If you don’t fix it now, it will be too late to do anything about it later. … What we want is competition that is fair.”
Ross Mitchell, Bombardier’s vice-president of commercial operations, told the panel that it offered to alter its planes to the ‘ CS100 Lite’ to win an order from United Continental, because the CS100 was too big.
“Our competition throughout was the even smaller Embraer 190. At the very end, however, Boeing swooped in and offered United a deal too good to refuse — not on a 100-seat aircraft, but on larger 737-700s that do not compete with the CS100,” Mitchell said.
Boeing has petitioned the U. S. Commerce Department and the U. S. International Trade Commission to investigate subsidies of Bombardier’s CSeries aircraft that it says have allowed the company to export planes at well below cost. A preliminary determination is expected by June 12. If the ITC determines there is a threat of injury to the U.S. industry, preliminary countervailing duties could be announced in July, followed in October by preliminary anti- dumping duties, unless the deadlines are extended. Final determinations are scheduled for October and December.
Boeing is calli ng f or countervailing duties of 79.41 per cent and anti- dumping charges of 79.82 per cent.
The Quebec government l ast year i nvested US$ 1 billion in exchange for a 49.5- per- cent stake in the CSeries. The federal government recently provided a $ 372.5- million loan. That’s on top of about $1 billion received in 2008 from Ottawa, Quebec and Britain to develop the CSeries.
Bombardier lawyer Peter Lichtenbaum said Boeing hasn’t lost sales as a result of Bombardier, and doesn’t even compete with Bombardier in the sales campaigns it has complained about because the CSeries is smaller than Boeing’s 737- 800 and Max 8 planes. “If this is a case of David vs. Goliath, Boeing has cast itself in the wrong role.”