National Post

At Tims, it’s the ‘3G Way’ or the highway

PROFITS ARE UP BUT SO IS FRANCHISEE ANGER AS NEW OWNERS IMPOSE THEIR VISION

- BY HOLLIE SHAW IN OAKVILLE, ONT.

During a recent visit to the Tim Hortons headquarte­rs, Daniel Schwartz happily pokes fun at some of the more regimented hallmarks of the chain’s owner, Restaurant Brands Internatio­nal Inc., right down to the optimal look of an office desk.

Stopping by a row of communal desks where chief executive Schwartz and chief financial officer Josh Kobza sit several times a month alongside the office’s 400 or so other workers, he points to one that is empty save for a solitary Kleenex box.

“This," he said while gesturing with an exaggerate­dly proud sweep of his arm, "is an ideal desk,” alluding to the company’s directive for neat employee workstatio­ns. He pauses, then slides the tissue box several inches over onto a cluttered adjacent desk. “There,” he said, regarding the barren white expanse before him with a broad smile. “Now it’s perfect.”

Schwartz and Kobza are keen to show how the “3G Way” — the efficiency-driven management style espoused by the Brazilian entreprene­urs behind 3G Capital, Restaurant Brands Internatio­nal’s largest shareholde­r — is playing out at Tim Hortons as they prepare for the annual general meeting of shareholde­rs on June 5.

The headquarte­rs is certainly a far cry from the earth-toned cubicles and perimeter of walled offices that were expunged in the building’s sweeping renovation two years ago and is symbolic of the change that has rankled a number of Tim Hortons’ Canadian restaurant owners.

Frustrated with tough new standards for their restaurant­s, higher product costs and a culture that no longer lets them solve problems with a phone call to head office, they formally organized as an associatio­n and got legal representa­tion in March.

On the surface, everything seems to be going well. The 3G formula of cutting waste and simplifyin­g processes while pursuing an aggressive growth agenda has helped it successful­ly engineer the takeovers of some of the largest U. S. businesses including Burger King, AnheuserBu­sch, Kraft, Heinz and, most recently, Popeye’s Louisiana Chicken.

The f ormula has also helped deliver solid profits. Shares of Restaurant Brands Internatio­nal are up 50 per cent year-over-year, the company’s adjusted per- share earnings surged 45 per cent in 2016, and system- wide sales climbed 5.2 per cent at Tim Hortons and 7.8 per cent at Burger King.

Overall revenue rose to US$ 4.2 billion in 2016 from US$ 4.05 billion a year earlier, while the company managed to cut its total operating costs and expenses by 14 per cent to US$ 2.47 billion from US$2.86 billion.

As a result, its operating margin, the amount of revenue generated after paying operating costs, was 40 per cent in 2016, compared to 31 per cent at the world’s largest fast food company, McDonald’s Corp.

The path to profits has been, at times, unpleasant, especially for those used to the classic Tim Hortons corporate culture, where doing business was built around relationsh­ips and golf games. That management style made it Canada’s biggest quick-service restaurant chain, accounting for a quarter of the $ 26- billion fast-food market.

But scores of Tim Hortons employees at the Oakville head office west of Toronto were let go in early 2015 after the company’s merger with Burger King, and almost entirely r eplaced with a new crop of keen, young staffers.

The building also underwent a cosmetic makeover. A big chunk of it now consists of a warehouse- like room that reflects 3G’s cultural tenets: the company’s mission statement is on a banner and its goals are colourfull­y painted on the white walls.

Real- time electronic billboards display employee success metrics: for example, the number of croissants and breakfast sandwiches sold at each restaurant every day that week, and franchisee drive- thru times ( less than 25 seconds puts a franchise in the green zone; more than 30 seconds puts them in the red zone).

“We want all of our employees to think of themselves as owners,” said Kobza, whose father owned a small business when he was growing up in Florida. Such a culture of accountabi­lity “is a mentality,” he added. “We want everyone to act as if they are running their own small business.”

On their desks, employees post a list of up to eight self- written objectives for everyone else to see. “You can’t manage what you don’t measure,” said Schwartz, echoing a maxim of management consulting guru Peter Drucker.

Staffers also partake in quarterly Lean Six Sigma training exercises to improve business processes and productivi­ty.

In May, dozens engaged in a timed mock sandwichma­king exercise meant to enhance their problem-solv- ing skills. They were challenged to use non- verbal communicat­ion while racing around tables covered in pieces of felt shaped like bread, tomatoes, cheese and turkey slices.

“They have a much more structured approach to dealing with problems,” after going through the exercises, Kobza said. “They identify a problem’s root causes and come up with a clear action plan.”

The open concept room, meanwhile, is meant to emphasize collaborat­ion and efficient use of time.

But those critical of the new management style say the company is being run by a group of merciless bean counters.

“It’s a very, very different place than it was,” said one former employee who stayed at Tim Hortons after the initial rounds of layoffs. “But I think the people who came in after the layoffs absolutely loved it, because they didn’t know what it was like before.”

The former employee applauds some aspects of 3G’s approach, despite a new era of cost controls that can bor- der on the extreme, such as a clampdown on office supplies like pens and folders.

“They are very cards on the table. The culture is what it is, and they really lay it out for you,” he said.

“Everyone can see what the CEO’s metrics are. You know what your own targets are, because you see them on your desk every day. And if it is not the place for you, you can always leave — no hard feelings.”

Schwartz l aughs when asked about the office supplies. Though he denies there’s a lockdown, he said all costs need to be justified.

The bulk of the big expense cuts at Tim Hortons, he noted — a company jet, the regular use of Federal Express when emails would suffice — happened more than two years ago.

“But we f rankly don’t spend that much time thinking about ways to cut costs,” he said. “We are focused on growth,” particular­ly in places such as the U. S., U. K. and the Philippine­s through local master franchise partners.

“We want to look back 20 years from now and say we wanted to be really impactful and we transforme­d an industry,” Schwartz said, pointing to one of the goals on the office wall about becoming the world’s biggest fast food brand. ( Currently, it’s in third place, behind McDonald’s and Yum Brands Inc., owner of KFC and Taco Bell.)

The transforma­tion does not sit well with David Hughes, along time Tim Hortons franchisee from Lethbridge, Alta., who owns five stores.

“We are now part of an equation focused on profit extraction, and that profit goes to shareholde­rs,” said Hughes, president of Tim Hortons’ new associatio­n of Canadian franchisee­s, which organized this year amid mounting frustratio­n and unresolved post- takeover concerns.

Calling themselves the Great White North Franchisee Associatio­n, the group said 3G’s business practices are set up to squeeze more profit out of store owners.

When the company introduced new quality scoring metrics for franchisee­s called the Global Performanc­e Standard, which tracks objectives such as store cleanlines­s and drive- thru times, Hughes said 85 per cent of Tim Hortons franchises failed, as did four of his five locations, which received exceptiona­l scores under the old regime.

Hughes received poor scores for infraction­s such as having the wrong sugar strainers. Another franchisee was docked for having the wrong pair of scissors in the kitchen.

The disgruntle­d f ranchisees, who have secured l egal representa­tion and an executive director, Terry Connoy — who used to run the Canadian Tire Dealers’ Associatio­n, the most powerful group of dealer- owners in the country — are also unhappy about what they say is a misuse of a company advertisin­g fund to which they contribute 3.5 per cent of their gross revenue.

They said they have received an inadequate audit of the fund, whose administra­tive expenses appear to have more than doubled to $ 31 million in 2015 from $14.6 million in 2013.

The bulk of the franchisee­s’ suppliers have also changed, and costs to franchisee­s are higher than before.

“For goods and commoditie­s, in some cases, we are paying sometimes 100- percent more than we should be,” Hughes said.

A commoditie­s expert hired by the franchisee­s determined that they should by paying $ 10.80 more for a case of coffee since the takeover, after accounting for foreign exchange and raw product price fluctuatio­ns, but they are paying $ 22.05, or about $ 13,750 more per store each year for their topselling product

Likewise, the cost of a case of bacon should have gone up by $ 50, but franchise owners are getting charged $ 104 more, or about $ 5,400 per store per year.

The associatio­n also believes management is looking to squeeze out franchisee owners who have a smaller base of stores in favour of larger owners by ousting them as their licences expire or because they have poor GPS scores.

One of the associatio­n’s strongest supporters is Donald Schroeder, formerly Tim Hortons chief executive and a former franchisee.

Restaurant Brands Internatio­nal “appears to be singularly focused on cutting costs without regard to the long- term negative effect on the brand, or the store owners who have worked so hard to build the brand,” Schroeder said in an open l etter to f ranchisees in March.

“Left unchecked, there will certainly be a major consolidat­ion of store ownership — fewer store owners to deal with is much more convenient and less costly than dealing with a system where the average franchisee owns about 3.5 stores.”

In Canada, where t he chain still has 82 per cent of its restaurant­s, there are roughly 1,100 franchisee­s for about 3,800 restaurant­s. But in new markets such as the Philippine­s and Mexico, Tim Hortons is partnering with large local franchise groups that will each operate dozens of restaurant­s.

Schwartz has said management will only speak about franchisee concerns with the company’s official elected advisory board of 16 Tim Hortons franchisee­s, and has no intention of speaking with Hughes’ group, regardless of how many have signed on.

“I don’t want to speculate,” Schwartz said, when asked why franchisee­s would form an associatio­n if the existing advisory board adequately represente­d their concerns. “We continue to work with the advisory board.”

At the end of March, Restaurant Brands Internatio­nal executives, i ncluding Schwartz, held an open call with Tim Hortons franchisee­s, and apologized for not doing a good job of listening to their concerns during the past two years.

Asked about t he call, Schwartz said the company has now adjusted its GPS scoring system and given franchisee­s all the informatio­n it is required to disclose in its audit of the ad fund.

Since Restaurant Brands Internatio­nal’s formation, he added, “our overall business market share has grown and the profitabil­ity of our franchise owners has grown.”

Schwartz might not be keen to negotiate with the unhappy franchisee­s, but 3G is very familiar with how to work in harmony with such groups.

Burger King in the U. S. has one of the most powerful franchisee associatio­ns in North America, said Les Stewart, a veteran Ontariobas­ed franchisee consultant, “and yet 3G still saw fit to buy Burger King.”

Stewart believes Tim Hortons franchisee­s would have more power if, like Burger King’s U. S. franchisee­s, they operated more like a co- operative that owns and controls the contracts for the products it buys and the supply chain, rather than buying them through head office.

Restaurant Brands Internatio­nal generates a fixed percentage of its sales and boosts its profits by selling supplies to its franchisee­s, as Tim Hortons did in the past.

“But the idea that you are going to have the good old days at Tim Hortons where you (as a Canadian franchisee) make your money without getting involved in these kinds of business decisions is over with 3G running things,” Stewart said.

Stewart noted veteran investor Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. is earning nine per cent in annual interest on the US$ 3 billion of preferred equity it committed to finance 3G’s deal to form Restaurant Brands Internatio­nal.

“That ni ne per c e nt doesn’ t happen with a double-double and a cruller.”

 ?? PHOTOS: PETER J. THOMPSON / NATIONAL POST ?? The Tim Hortons mission statement is now prominentl­y displayed on the wall at the company’s head office in Oakville. “It’s a very, very different place than it was,” said one former employee.
PHOTOS: PETER J. THOMPSON / NATIONAL POST The Tim Hortons mission statement is now prominentl­y displayed on the wall at the company’s head office in Oakville. “It’s a very, very different place than it was,” said one former employee.
 ??  ?? Many Tim Hortons employees at the Oakville head office were let go in early 2015 after the company’s merger with Burger King, and the building itself also underwent a cosmetic makeover including mission statements painted on walls.
Many Tim Hortons employees at the Oakville head office were let go in early 2015 after the company’s merger with Burger King, and the building itself also underwent a cosmetic makeover including mission statements painted on walls.
 ??  ?? Tim Hortons employee Seher Khan, left, takes part in a mock sandwich-making trainingse­ssion involving using non-verbal communicat­ion and gathering pieces of felt shaped like bread, tomatoes, cheese and turkey slices.
Tim Hortons employee Seher Khan, left, takes part in a mock sandwich-making trainingse­ssion involving using non-verbal communicat­ion and gathering pieces of felt shaped like bread, tomatoes, cheese and turkey slices.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada