National Post

The one drawback to LED lights

- Brian Turner Driving. ca

Consumers have every right to expect t hat advancemen­ts in vehicle design, engineerin­g, and technology are brought forward and introduced to improve function, safety, and motoring enjoyment. But countless automotive blogs, driver chat rooms and letters from less-than-satisfied owners to automakers often dispel this perception.

A great example is the increasing use of LEDs ( light emitting diodes) to light up the exterior of our rides.

Auto designers and engineers are turning to these little luminous marvels to allow them to create new styles of lamps to compliment sleek and/or aggressive exterior forms. With LEDs, headlamps no longer have to be large, non- aerodynami­c hulking bulks that break up body and hood lines. Tail lamps as well can be sculpted into unheard-of forms and fit into uniquely shaped niches in vertical, diagonal, or horizontal layouts. They make things easier when it comes to crafting self- levelling or steering-directable lamps in less expensive vehicles.

And, of course, t heir power- conserving abilities help in reducing fuel consumptio­n. Yes, the more electric power a vehicle demands of its alternator, the harder it becomes to physically spin, and the more fuel its engine has to use to operate it. Swapping out incandesce­nt lamps for LEDs won’t necessaril­y make a major difference in f uel economy, but with car manufactur­ers striving to meet increasing­ly stiffer government fuel- efficiency standards, every little bit counts.

Automobile­s are not the first group to encounter the LED invasion. Consider home and municipal use. The average signalized traffic intersecti­on equipped with incandesce­nt bulbs can consume up to the equivalent of the same electricit­y as 2.5 Canadian homes annually and a total switch to LEDs ( done in countless towns and cities around the globe) can provide the same light for about 10 per cent of that amount.

But one major drawback that both traffic lights and vehicles have experience­d with LEDs is their lack of produced heat. While the LED drivers mounted onto vehicle headlamps can produce enough heat that they require cooling fans, little of this energy gets to the lens, where it can help to melt snow and ice. Fortunatel­y, the air flow over these lamps helps to keep things clear in the winter.

The same cannot be said for tail lamps. Take a look at vehicles ahead of you while driving on snow- covered roads when their tires are kicking up a suitable amount of the white stuff. If those drivers are intelligen­t enough to have on all of their exterior lights, those vehicles equipped with incandesce­nt bulbs will be showing you a bright clear red lens ( unless they’re salt covered), while most of the LED type will be white with snow and almost useless.

Traffic- l i ght designers crafted the little metal hoods over each lamp specifical­ly to take advantage of prevailing winds in the effort to focus and funnel air movement to blow snow off the lenses. But even these innovation­s have their limits in freezing- rain events. Maybe it’s time for auto designers to look at their creations’ aerodynami­cs.

To be safe while driving in winter with LED lamps ( regardless of the time of day or the light or visibility conditions) make sure all of your exterior lights are on and clear of snow or ice (of course, this goes for nonLED lamps as well). This may mean stopping from time to time to give them a quick wipe with your snow brush, but if you’re in thick traffic in the middle of a snow squall, this small inconvenie­nce is a much better alternativ­e to being rear-ended.

If you want to know if your ride is incandesce­nt or LED equipped, pop the exterior lights on when it’s parked in the driveway and has a dusting of snow on it. Within a few minutes you’ll have the answer.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada