National Post

Hajdu clarifies jobs grant but wording unchanged

Reaches out to religious leaders amid controvers­y

- Brian Platt

• Employment Minister Patty Hajdu is looking to defuse the controvers­y over the Canada Summer Jobs program, as her office clarifies the terms used in the attestatio­n, and puts in calls to faith- based groups concerned their religious freedom is at stake.

But the wording on the applicatio­n form itself is unchanged, and one group who received a call from Hajdu says the attestatio­n remains “unacceptab­le.”

Groups applying for the Canada Summer Jobs grant this year are required to attest that both the job and the organizati­on’s “core mandate” respect reproducti­ve rights, among other rights. The 2018 applicatio­n guide says this includes “the right to access safe and legal abortions.”

Hajdu hit the phones on Monday, calling the Canadian Council of Christian Charities, the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, and the United Church of Canada.

“I have reached out to many of the religious leaders across the country ... encouraged them to work with their individual organizati­ons and churches across the country to let them know that this is about the activities of the organizati­on and the job descriptio­n,” she said on Tuesday morning.

Also on Tuesday, the government posted a new document called “Supplement­ary Informatio­n” about the grant program, and it includes a definition of core mandate: “This is the primary activities undertaken by the organizati­on that reflect the organizati­on’s ongoing services provided to the community. It is not the beliefs of the organizati­on, and it is not the values of the organizati­on.”

It also says “respect” means the activities “do not seek to remove or actively undermine these existing rights.”

The document outlines five hypothetic­al examples of organizati­ons who might be applying. “A faith- based organizati­on with anti-abortion beliefs applies for funding to hire students to serve meals to the homeless ... This organizati­on would be eligible to apply,” it says.

“A summer camp submits an applicatio­n to hire students as camp counsellor­s,” says another example. “However, the camp does not welcome LGBTQ2 young people. The camp is not eligible to apply.”

The Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops said Monday was the first time it had heard from the minister, and the “short telephone call” has not solved the problem.

“Despite her statement today and the recently added definition of terms, the CCCB remains seriously concerned,” it said. “The attestatio­n remains unacceptab­le.”

Wording of the attestatio­n has caused widespread backlash, including from at least one Liberal caucus member. Newfoundla­nd Liberal MP Scott Simms told his local CBC station on Monday that the attestatio­n should be changed.

Meanwhile, the government is fighting a motion in Federal Court for an injunction that would temporaril­y halt the attestatio­n. The motion was filed by the Toronto Right to Life Associatio­n as part of its case arguing that the attestatio­n violates the Charter rights to freedom of expression, freedom of conscience and religion, and equal treatment under the law.

A hearing on the injunction was held Friday morning, but a decision has not yet been announced.

THE CCCB REMAINS SERIOUSLY CONCERNED.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada