Atwal claims friendship with PM
SURREY, B.C .• Am an convicted of attempted murder who was invited to a dinner reception with Justin Trudeau in India says he has a friendly relationship with the prime minister, and stayed away to save him from further embarrassment.
But the Prime Minister’s Office says there is no merit to the assertions by Jaspal Atwal, who was convicted of attempted murder in the 1980s, especially the claim that he and Trudeau were friends.
The dispute emerges after Atwal was interviewed at his home in Surrey, B.C., following Trudeau’s, at times, turbulent trip to India, which ended with his return to Ottawa on Sunday.
Atwal says he received an invitation directly from the Canadian High Commissioner’s office for the event in New Delhi last week.
B.C. Liberal MP Randeep Sarai has said in a statement it was his choice alone to include Atwa lon the guest list and he realized afterward that he exercised poor judgment in doing so.
On Sunday, a senior government official said, on the condition of anonymity, that the high commission invited some guests after receiving recommendations from others, including MPs such as Sarai.
Atwal said he has known Trudeau for years. During one of Trudeau’s visits to B.C. in 2008 or 2009, he said the pair sat together in Atwal’s Hummer and chatted.
“We know each other. He knows my name, he’ll come and say, ‘ Hey Jas, how you doing?’ We have a good relationship. I never see any problem,” he said Saturday. “But now he says, ‘Oh Jaspal’s not supposed to be here, this and that.’ It surprised me.”
Trudeau’s spokesman, Cameron Ahmad, said the prime minister and Atwal are not friends.
“That is not true,” Ahmad said in an interview. Asked about the Humvee conversation, Ahmad said: “I don’t know what he’s referring to there, but no, they are not (friends).”
Atwal said he is not a member of the Liberal party and has helped politicians from different parties both federally and provincially.
He said he was travelling in India last week on a personal trip and questioned why Sarai is taking the blame alone for his invitation to the reception.
“I don’t know why he’s taking all the responsibility; he had nothing to do with that,” he said. “The high commissioner, they’re the one giving the invitation. Everyone’s name goes through CSIS and the RCMP.”
But Ahmad disputed Atwal’s version of events, reiterating the statement that Sarai released last week.
“I would refer to what the prime minister said when he addressed these matters in India on two occasions,” said Ahmad.
“It is not true, these claims that come from Mr. Atwal.”
Atwal was convicted of attempting to kill Indian cabinet minister Malkiat Singh Sidhu during a visit to Vancouver Island in 1986.
At the time, Atwal was a member of the International Sikh Youth Federation, a banned terrorist group in Canada and India.
He was also charged, but not convicted, in connection with a 1985 attack on Ujjal Dosanjh, a staunch opponent of the Sikh separatist movement, who later became B.C. premier and a federal Liberal cabinet minister.
Atwal said he does not support Khalistani organizations and warns Sikh youth in B. C. against believing propaganda from separatists, many of whom he believes have a financial interest in the cause.
He confirmed he was blacklisted from visiting India because of his crime. But he said any suggestion the government of India intervened — either by getting him an invitation or removing him from the blacklist so that he could attend — is a “total lie.”
“India’s government has nothing to do with anything,” Atwal said.
Ahmad said the Prime Minister’s Office has no comment on Indian policies regarding visas or blacklists.
A government official, discussing the matter on condition of anonymity, has said guest lists for receptions such as those in India are not vetted individually for security. Those who issue the invitations are expected to do their own due diligence.
The official also suggested Atwal’s presence was engineered by elements within the Indian government to distance the country from Ottawa, driven by concerns that Canada is not fully committed to a united India.