WALL ST. DENIED IN REWRITE OF U. S. SENATE BANKING BILL
COMPROMISE NEEDS DEMOCRAT SUPPORT, HOUSE REPUBLICANS DEMAND MORE
Wall Street banks don’ t have much to celebrate in what’s probably the final version of a bill easing financial rules that is headed for a U.S. Senate vote.
Late Wednesday, Senate Banking chairman Mike Crapo, an Idaho Republican, proposed some last- minute changes to his overhaul of the Dodd- Frank Act. He specified that foreign banks such as Deutsche Bank AG and Barclays PLC won’t benefit from a reprieve in his legislation that’s intended to help regional U.S. lenders.
Crapo’s revisions — filed in an amendment — also make clear that only custody banks, including State
Street Corp. and Bank of New York Mellon Corp., will win relief from a key post- crisis capital requirement. Citigroup Inc. and other l enders had been pushing lawmakers to expand a provision in the original bill so they would also get a break.
And Crapo declined to make changes to the Volcker Rule that firms such as Goldman Sachs Group
Inc. had been pressing for. Another recipient of bad news is Equifax Inc., the credit company whose 2017 hack put millions of consumers at risk of identity theft. Crapo’s amendment would require it and competitors to provide free credit monitoring to some consumers after a breach.
But Equifax and its competitors could benefit from a separate section Crapo added to his bill. The provision affects Fair Isaac Corp., the creator of the FICO credit score that is crucial to consumers getting a mortgage. Crapo’s revision would direct mortgage- finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to use credit scores offered by other companies, instead of exclusively relying on FICO assessments. Equifax and other credit- reporting companies own VantageScore Solutions LLC, a potential rival to Fair Isaac.
The bill broadly marks the Senate’s biggest overhaul of Dodd- Frank since it became law eight years ago. Crapo’s legislation is largely aimed at giving small and regional banks a reprieve from regulations put in place after the 2008 financial crisis, including raising the threshold for banks subject to aggressive oversight because they’re considered “too- big- to- fail.” To be sure, it does include some goodies for Wall Street.
The l egislation’s backers — including at least a dozen Senate Democrats — say smaller firms didn’t cause the meltdown and that burdensome rules are preventing them from making loans that would spur economic growth. But progressives, including Massachusetts Democrat Elizabeth Warren, have repeatedly framed the bill as an assault on consumers t hat will undermine crucial reforms.
The Senate is expected to vote on Crapo’s bill next week, and lawmakers started the process of considering amendments Thursday. While dozens of amendments have already been offered, Crapo’s proposed revisions are by far the most important. His legislation is a compromise, not rolling rules back as much as the finance industry would like and doing little to help Wall Street.
It remains to be seen whether Crapo’s efforts will win the backing of House Republicans, who must also approve the bill for it to reach President Donald Trump’s desk. Last year, the House passed much more sweeping legislation that would rip up much of DoddFrank. If some House GOP members demand a more aggressive rollback, Senate Democrats could walk away, causing the legislation to fail.
In a sign of the tension that could come, House Financial Services Committee chair Jeb Hensarling told re- porters Thursday that Crapo’s amendment doesn’t satisfy the changes he wants to see.
““We got three or four dozen bills that have passed the House,” said Hensarling, a Texas Republican. “We expect them to be in any bill that goes to the president’s desk.”
The version Crapo released Wednesday puts to rest questions about whether the biggest foreign banks doing business in the U. S. — such as Deutsche Bank, Barclays and HSBC Holdings
PLC — would piggyback on the major break mid- sized lenders are poised to get from post-crisis oversight.
It clarified that foreign banks with more than US$100 billion in consolidated U.S. assets will still be subject to aggressive monitoring by the Federal Reserve, echoing what Fed officials including vice- chair Randal Quarles have said.
The move follows criticism from some Democrats that Crapo’s legislation could free non- U. S. banks from stress testing and other burdens — leaving them “mostly deregulated,” according to Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio. One of the key requirements for the foreign banks was to set up “intermediate holding companies” in the U. S., and the latest version of the bill keeps that in place.
Industr y groups have been lobbying right up to an expected Senate vote to persuade lawmakers to expand a provision in the initial Crapo bill on what’s known as the supplemental leverage ratio, which forces Wall Street banks to maintain billions of dollars of capital to protect against losses.
The amendment Crapo released Wednesday indicates the campaign failed, as he left the language on the leverage ratio unchanged. That means custody banks such as Bank of New York Mellon and State Street that safeguard assets for the customers remain the only firms getting relief.
Still, the Fed is separately working to relax the capital requirement in a way that would benefit more lenders. The Congressional Budget Office estimated in a report earlier this week that there’s a 50- per- cent chance that the Fed will relax the rule for Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase & Co. should Congress pass Crapo’s bill.
For years, big banks like Goldman Sachs have been trying to relax the Volcker Rule’s ban on proprietary trading. While most of their focus has been on regulators, one change they’ve sought from lawmakers is reducing the number of agencies with authority over the rule. That, in turn, could make it easier to soften its impact. Crapo has declined to provide such relief in his legislation.