National Post

Some U.S. farmers face new risks

COMMENT Trump trade moves dismantle supports

- To ban Dyck

Anita Mether farms in Idaho alongside her husband. They have decades of experience.

But during a session on the global commoditie­s market at the Commodity Classic conference in Anaheim, Calif., in February, she learned something new.

I was sitting beside her as the presenter painted a clear and digestible picture of a global marketplac­e that lives and breathes and makes decisions — whether the U. S. is part of it or not.

At the end of i t, Mrs. Mether gasped, turned to me and said, “Wow! I’d never thought of it that way before.”

I didn’t know anyone in the room. And while visibly surprised, she seemed happy and eager to engage with someone before the informatio­n became stale. The once disparate pieces suddenly fell into place. It was her eureka moment.

Suddenly, Mrs. Mether and the 8,000 or so others attending the flagship event had to deal with the bleak reality that the president many of them were responsibl­e for electing was now dismantlin­g, day by day, the structures that support agricultur­e in the U.S.

Donald Trump stomped on TPP and NAFTA appears to be next. These moves have exposed U. S. farmers to just how vulnerable they are to a global market, a relatively new realizatio­n for many who have wrongly believed that American agricultur­e is domestical­ly sustainabl­e.

When the U. S. speaks ill of China, China slashes its U. S. soy imports and instead looks to places such as Brazil and Canada.

Exiting TPP means tariffs on commoditie­s exported to the involved countries will go up. And it’s the farmer who loses, as that price differenti­al has to be made up somewhere and growers are price takers, not makers. An exit from NAFTA means higher levies on products from Mexico and Canada that the U. S. relies on and a likely reduction in the commoditie­s Canada and Mexico imports.

No one enjoys feeling vulnerable.

I explained to Mr s . Mether that because Canada is about one- tenth the size of the U. S., its farmers, for the most part, observe the global commoditie­s market. We are aware of the soybean demands of a place l i ke China and we’re sensitive to what it takes to keep our export markets strong and our export clients happy. It’s just part of our fabric. This made sense to her. Canadian farmers wouldn’t have reacted the same way to that presentati­on, but it would be naïve for any one of us to believe that there’s nothing for us to learn from Mrs. Mether’s reaction. While the U. S. farming community is collective­ly coming to the realizatio­n that it is and always has been beholden to a healthy export market, this had been their blind spot. What is ours?

Canada is a global leader in the pulse trade, and tariffs in India have hurt our farmers. Lentil acres will be down in Saskatchew­an this year, as a result of India’s commitment to satisfy its high pulse demands domestical­ly.

Perhaps Canada’s blind spot is its dependency on export.

What would happen if we placed more of a priority on finding domestic uses for our agricultur­al products? It would require a change in how we view ourselves with- in a global market. It would require buy-in from our government.

Imagine how things could look 10, 15, 20 years from now if the Canadian government worked at creating a business- friendly environmen­t for companies interested in building processing facilities, refineries, malting plants and other value- add infrastruc­ture for the things we grow.

The pulse industry is urging Canadians to eat more beans, lentils, chickpeas and faba beans. But other commoditie­s require some steps in order to bring them to your table. Canola is a great ex- ample. It’s grown, processed and consumed in Canada.

Soy could be a similar story. And the demand for barley malt is only growing, as the craft beer industry shows no signs of slowing. There is huge benefit to having the capability to add value to a raw commodity. The capital investment is high and the model needs to be sustainabl­e, but it’s worth considerin­g.

Electric cars were a silly idea before they were a smart one. In an unpredicta­ble global marketplac­e, having options is never a bad thing.

 ?? DARREN HAUCK / GETTY IMAGES FILES ?? Farmer Rick Roden of Wisconsin. U. S. President Donald Trump’s trade moves have exposed U. S. farmers to how vulnerable they are to global markets, Toban Dyck writes.
DARREN HAUCK / GETTY IMAGES FILES Farmer Rick Roden of Wisconsin. U. S. President Donald Trump’s trade moves have exposed U. S. farmers to how vulnerable they are to global markets, Toban Dyck writes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada