Ford vs. Trudeau on climate
Doug Ford’s victory in the Ontario Progressive Conser vative leadership race changes the national climate policy picture in a significant way. Not because he is opposed to carbon taxes: Many other federal and provincial politicians are as well. What makes Ford different is his willingness to declare that he sees climate change as a secondary issue in comparison to basic bread- and- butter economic priorities.
Lots of politicians agree, but they are too nervous to say so. They find it safer to nod along with the loudest voices on the other side, whose righteous crusade against ( as they see it) planet- destroying fossil fuels leads them to believe that any policy, no matter how extreme and costly, is never enough.
Ford’s realism may inspire others to join him. And his view is well in line with expert opinion. The most recent report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, after surveying the projected costs and benefits of climate change, concluded: “For most economic sectors, the impact of climate change will be small relative to the impacts of other drivers… Changes in population, age, income, technology, relative prices, lifestyle, regulation, governance and many other aspects of socioeconomic development will have an impact on the supply and demand of economic goods and services that is large relative to the impact of climate change.”
In other words, when it comes to the things that truly affect peoples’ day- today lives, climate change might belong on the list, but far down. Polls show that people have largely figured this out for themselves, with climate change consistently ranking far behind most other priorities.
Policy should reflect this. It is not rational to say that, because climate change might (in theory) create some problems for people a few decades from now, we should impose energy policies that will create much larger problems for them now. Unfortunately, that is what plans like the Paris treaty oblige us to do.
It is even less rational once you realize that the policies are futile. The same models t hat s ay gl obal warming is a problem also say that Paris-type measures will not fix it. If Canada and all the other signatories do what they say they plan to do, the effect on the climate by the end of the century will be minuscule at best, despite the heavy economic costs.
And, as with Kyoto before it, we can safely predict that the other signatories to Paris will not keep their promises. We especially need to take account of the fact that President Donald Trump’s decision to pull the United States out of Paris has changed the situation for Canada. The U. S. is ramping up its economic competitiveness through energy- sector deregulation and an aban- donment of former president Barack Obama’s climate goals. We ignore this at our peril.
Ontario energy and climate policy needs to be rooted in current reality, not wishful thinking about what a subsequent U. S. president might someday do. We should pursue environmental policies that yield actual benefits at reasonable costs while supporting economic growth and job creation. That is how we used to approach the issue, and it resulted in decades of improvements in air and water quality, alongside continued economic growth.
The last few years, by contrast, have been marked by costly and futile gestures ( l i ke t he Ontario Green Energy Act) that are more about moralistic symbolism than improving peoples’ lives.
Ford’s priorities will lead to an inevitable showdown over Ottawa’s carbon-pricing mandate. In reality, this is a minor issue and deserves to be treated as such. It is not Ford’s problem that the Liberal federal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau embraced the Paris treaty without a plan to achieve its targets, much less a national consensus that doing so is worth the cost. The provinces are within their rights to tell the feds that if they want a carbon tax, they will have to impose it themselves and face the political consequences, not make the provinces do it for them.
Ottawa will object, of course, but if it cracks down it will find itself in the posi tion of i gnoring British Columbia’s pipeline obstruction, while forcing unpopular green taxes on everyone else. Perhaps that reflects its priorities, but I am doubtful it matches those of the general public.
IT IS NOT FORD’S PROBLEM THAT TRUDEAU EMBRACED THE PARIS TREATY WITHOUT A PLAN.