National Post

U.K. mum on U.S. death penalty concerns

- Gregory Katz Nishat Ahmed and

LONDON • A furor has erupted over leaked documents showing that British officials are not requiring their U.S. counterpar­ts to provide assurances that two alleged British jihadis linked to the Islamic State group will not be executed if they are eventually put on trial in the United States.

The Daily Telegraph said Monday it had seen a letter from Home Secretary Sajid Javid to U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions concerning two individual­s who have been in custody in Kurdishcon­trolled northeaste­rn Syria since their capture in eastern Syria in January.

The two men, Alexanda Kotey and El Shafee Elsheikh, were allegedly part of a notorious cell of British jihadis known for their barbaric treatment of hostages. They got the nickname “the Beatles” because of their British accents. The most prominent member of the group, known as “Jihadi John,” was killed in a 2015 drone strike.

In 2014 and 2015, the group held more than 20 Western hostages in Syria and tortured many of them. It beheaded seven American, British and Japanese journalist­s and aid workers and a group of Syrian soldiers, boasting of the butchery in grisly videos.

The disclosure prompted an emergency debate in Parliament. Labour Party legislator Diane Abbott called on the government to change course.

“This decision to abandon our principled opposition to the death penalty is both abhorrent and shameful, and I call on ministers even at this late stage to reverse this decision.”

Defending the government’s position, Security Minister Ben Wallace said it would not be right to withhold evidence in such a heinous case.

“We should not forget that the crimes that we’re talking about involve the beheading and videoing of those beheading dozens of innocent people by one of the most abhorrent organizati­ons walking this Earth,” he said.

Wallace said the government risks “being seen as hypocrites” if it never makes an exception in its demands for assurances that the death penalty will not be used but uses lethal force to kill people in battle.

The newspaper says Javid told Sessions that Britain would not seek “assurances” that the two would not be executed, which has caused controvers­y because Britain is a long-standing opponent of the death penalty. Britain typically does not send prisoners to other countries if they face possible execution.

The discussion between the two countries involves Britain providing informatio­n that might be used against the two in a future prosecutio­n in the U.S.

A spokeswoma­n for British Prime Minister Theresa May said she is aware of the letter. The spokeswoma­n says Britain remains opposed to the death penalty in all circumstan­ces but views it as a “priority” to make sure these two men face criminal prosecutio­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada