National Post

The dangers of lower drug prices

- Kristina M. L. acri all Dr. Kristina M. L. Acri is an associate professor of economics at Colorado College and a senior fellow at the Fraser Institute.

While an unknown entity to most Canadians, the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) performs a vital role in the health and well-being of patients across the country. The board was created to balance two major policy objectives: protecting consumers from excessive prices for patented medicines and ensuring sufficient incentives for innovators to introduce new medicines to Canada.

Unfortunat­ely, recently proposed changes by the Trudeau government clearly discourage the introducti­on of innovative new drugs in Canada, potentiall­y deprioriti­zing Canada in the global launch sequences for new drugs. The proposed changes would lower patented drug prices, jeopardizi­ng the delicate policy balance between controllin­g expenditur­es on drugs and promoting access to beneficial and potentiall­y lifesaving drug therapies.

At the federal level, Canada regulates the prices of

patented medicines to ensure prices of patented drugs are not “excessive.” This extends to every patented drug, whether covered on an insurer’s formulary or not. In May 2017, Health Canada proposed an update to several aspects of PMPRB regulation­s governing patented medicines.

A recently released Fraser Institute study examines these proposed changes and identifies several areas of critical concern.

In particular, in establishi­ng the maximum allowable price for patented drugs, the PMPRB currently compares Canada’s patented drug prices with prices in seven other countries: France, Germany, Italy, Sweden, Switzerlan­d, the United Kingdom and the United States. Under the proposed changes, the reference countries would no longer include the U.S. or Switzerlan­d, and would instead add seven other countries: Australia, Belgium, Japan, the Netherland­s, Norway, South Korea and Spain. This new reference-country basket will undoubtedl­y lower the maximum allowable prices of drugs, thereby requiring pharmaceut­ical innovators to lower their prices in Canada to comply, a policy some innovators will refuse to accommodat­e.

So what’s the problem with lower prices?

While lower prices are ordinarily good news, they’re only good news if the drugs are actually available. Health Canada estimates the proposed changes will generate savings of $12.6 billion over the next 10 years through reduced prices for patented medicines. However, there’s reason to worry that the proposed changes may also reduce the availabili­ty of new therapies for Canadian patients.

For example, if biopharmac­eutical innovators in the burgeoning field of biologic drugs believe the new regulation­s prevent them from profitably marketing their drugs in Canada, they may simply choose not to launch new products in Canada. Instead of improving access to new medicines for Canadians, the new regulation­s may create another barrier to access.

At a fundamenta­l level, profit both incentiviz­es innovation and helps fund research and developmen­t. Accordingl­y, higher prices boost profitabil­ity, allowing for more investment, increased research and developmen­t, and ultimately more innovation and drug discoverie­s. Profit creates a virtuous cycle where profitable innovation­s today finance lifesaving and lifeenhanc­ing treatments and cures tomorrow. But Ottawa’s proposed changes will reduce the financial capacity of innovators to invest in the Canadian life sciences sector, decreasing revenues of the innovative biopharmac­eutical sector by an estimated $8.6 billion over the next 10 years. The unfortunat­e result will be less innovation and less access to new drugs for Canadian patients.

The extent these proposed changes will alter the role and responsibi­lities of the PMPRB is alarming — they will transform the review board into a more restrictiv­e national price-control regulator for patented medicines. The new and expanded role of the PMPRB will negatively impact patient access to medicines and the viability of the Canadian life sciences sector.

Any government should approach changes of this magnitude with thoughtful study and considerat­ion. In this case, the Trudeau government has done neither. While the proposed changes purport to bolster Canada’s health-care system, in reality they will only undermine the system and constrict patient treatment options. Canadians should think twice before accepting policies changes that will only hurt them.

INNOVATORS MAY SIMPLY CHOOSE NOT TO LAUNCH NEW PRODUCTS IN CANADA.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada