National Post

CENSORSHIP

SUPPRESSIO­N TECHNOLOGY IS SET TO BECOME CHINA’S NEXT BIG EXPORT.

- ElliE Zolfaghari­fard

LONDON • In its mission to rewrite the rules of the internet, China has gone on a global charm offensive. The usually secretive nation has been seducing world leaders and emerging markets with “techno-dystopian” tools that promise to suppress dissent — and its campaign against democracy is working.

“Democracie­s are struggling in the digital age, while China is exporting its model of censorship and surveillan­ce to control informatio­n both inside and outside its borders,” said Michael Abramowitz, president of U.S. government­funded watchdog Freedom House.

“This pattern poses a threat to the open internet and endangers prospects for greater democracy worldwide.”

According to a Freedom House study of 65 countries released Thursday, there has been a decline in global internet freedom for the eighth year running, largely due to Chinese-style technologi­es. At the same time, the world has seen an increase in online propaganda and the unbridled collection of personal data.

Chinese firms like Baidu, Tencent, Chinese Unicom and Alibaba are increasing their reach globally. Today, China has nine of the world’s top 20 technology firms. While it was once viewed as an imitator, it is now leading the world in innovation in areas such as artificial intelligen­ce and 5G.

In the last few years, Chinese officials have held sessions on managing data with dozens of countries including Egypt, Jordan, Vietnam, Lebanon, Libya and Saudi Arabia. During some of these meetings, they have provided technology that could be used to monitor and censor citizens, including telecommun­ications equipment, facial recognitio­n tools and data-analytics systems, according to the report.

While the exact topics of the training sessions have not been clear, their influence has been.

For instance, training for Vietnamese officials that took place in April 2017 was followed this year by the introducti­on of a strict Chinese-style cyber-security law in Vietnam that requires the likes of Facebook and Google to hand over personal data on citizens. Last week, the communist country set up a web monitoring unit that can scan up to 100 million news items per day for “fake news.”

“Increased activity by Chinese companies and officials in Africa similarly preceded the passage of restrictiv­e cybercrime and media laws in Uganda and Tanzania over the past year,” according to the report. The spread of internet and mobile equipment across Africa has been helped by Chinese companies, notably Shenzhen-based Transsion Holdings.

Chinese foreign ministry official spokesman Lu Kang said the accusation­s made by Freedom House are “without basis, unprofessi­onal, irresponsi­ble, and have ulterior motives.” Cyberspace is complex, he said, and requires “the global community, including government­s, businesses, think tanks and media to adopt a constructi­ve attitude to maintain it.”

However, China’s model for a digital dystopia is clear. The nation has seen an uptick in state surveillan­ce this year. At least 16 cities across China are using facial recognitio­n technology that claims to be 99.8 per cent accurate. The country’s social credit system, which launched in 2014 and will be nationwide by 2020, is providing the state with even more reason to track the behaviour of individual­s on a large scale.

In Xinjiang, which is home to the country’s Uighur Muslim minority, facial recognitio­n is being used to prevent anything that threatens “public order” or “national security.” Leaked documents in August suggested as many as a million Muslims may be held in internment camps in Xinjiang where they undergo political indoctrina­tion and abuse, often for non-violent online offences.

China’s digital tools have inspired other nations that want to keep their citizens under strict control. The Freedom House report found 17 government­s approved or proposed laws restrictin­g online media in the name of fighting “fake news.”

“It’s very striking to see how China has moved from a defensive posture, where it closed itself off from outside influences, to one where it is exporting its own model,” said Adrian Shahbaz, Freedom House’s research director.

Technology titans are helping China. Google, for instance, has been working on an app to bring its censored search engine back to the nation in a move that would allow it to reach an extra 772 million internet users — but it is doing it under Chinese rules.

Code-named Project Dragonfly, the search engine would block sites banned by the country’s ruling communist party, as well as terms like “human rights” and “democracy.”

In July, Facebook attempted to quietly set up a subsidiary in China following its 2009 ban. It was quickly denied a licence by Chinese regulators in what many saw as a political move. “It’s unsustaina­ble for major internatio­nal tech companies to go in and operate in China,” said Shahbaz. “It won’t be long before many of these companies are requested to censor speech and hand over private data of users. They’re going to be put in an uncomforta­ble situation with a country where there isn’t a sense of democratic accountabi­lity.”

Even if the likes of Google pull out, China has a firm hold of the global digital infrastruc­ture. Companies such as Huawei are building infrastruc­ture all over the world including Africa and Latin America, according to Freedom House board chairman Michael Chertoff, a former U.S. secretary of homeland security.

State-owned China Unicom, China Telecom and China Mobile are also creating a “digital Silk Road” with fibre-optic links to Myanmar, Kyrgyzstan and Nepal.

“This opens up a potential for exploiting informatio­n in these countries by having technologi­cal back doors that can be used by the Chinese government to collect intelligen­ce,” Chertoff said.

The solution, according to Admiral Lord West, is not to ban Chinese companies, but to keep a close eye on them. The ex-First Sea Lord of Britain, who served as security minister under prime minister Gordon Brown, said Chinese firms are too embedded in global networks to simply ignore.

Shahbaz agrees that we must find a way to closely monitor China.

“China is gaining more and more leverage over internatio­nal technology companies, but also over democratic government­s. There’s going to have to be a greater reckoning from both tech companies and societies about how technology can service the public interest.”

If that does not happen, China could quickly see its vision of “techno-dystopia” become a reality.

IT’S VERY STRIKING TO SEE HOW CHINA HAS MOVED FROM A DEFENSIVE POSTURE, WHERE IT CLOSED ITSELF OFF FROM OUTSIDE INFLUENCES, TO ONE WHERE IT IS EXPORTING ITS OWN MODEL — ADRIAN SHAHBAZ, FREEDOM HOUSE’S RESEARCH DIRECTOR

THIS OPENS UP A POTENTIAL FOR EXPLOITING INFORMATIO­N.

 ??  ??
 ?? THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES ?? This week’s news that a Russian crime ring has amassed 1.2 billion usernames and password combinatio­ns makes now a good time to review ways to protect yourself online. The hacking misdeeds were described in a New York Times story based on the findings of Hold Security.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES This week’s news that a Russian crime ring has amassed 1.2 billion usernames and password combinatio­ns makes now a good time to review ways to protect yourself online. The hacking misdeeds were described in a New York Times story based on the findings of Hold Security.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada