National Post

‘OUR LIVELIHOOD IS GONE. WE’RE ALL IN LIMBO.’

Ottawa’s rosy views on competitiv­eness and the economy can’t save the car

- JOHN IVISON in Ottawa

It doesn’t seem that long ago that the Liberal government was telling Canadians the economy is strong and the middle class is making progress.

That’s because it was last Wednesday, in the fall fiscal update.

Bill Morneau, the finance minister, was remarkably upbeat, claiming the government had struck the “appropriat­e balance” between prudence and spending; that a return to budgetary balance was merely “a question of timing.”

But the news from GM Monday that it plans to close five North American auto plants, including one in Oshawa, Ont., with the loss of 14,000 jobs across the continent, shows how quickly the best-laid schemes of mice and men go awry.

The mood across Ontario mirrored the weather — bleak and misty. There was another parallel between the elements and the closure — this country’s politician­s could do nothing about either of them.

Justin Trudeau offered the equivalent of thoughts and prayers: “Our thoughts go out to the workers,” he said. Doug Ford, the Ontario premier, sounded resigned to the loss of thousands of jobs: “The ship has already left the dock,” he said.

Their comments stood in stark contrast to Donald Trump, who reacted to the closure of four plants in the U.S., the consequenc­e of sagging sedan sales.

The president thundered that he’d been tough on GM chief executive, Mary Barra, that the U.S. had done a lot for her company and if its cars weren’t selling, it needed to replace them with cars that did.

Oshawa’s assembly plant will be the largest closure with 2,973 job losses, followed by the plants in Ohio and Detroit. The restructur­ing will also see about 8,000 white collar workers loss their jobs.

David Paterson, General Motors Canada’s vice president of corporate affairs, said Oshawa was particular­ly vulnerable since it made cars and operated at one-third capacity for the past several years. GM chief executive Mary Barra is not prepared to run plants at that capacity when it needs cash to invest in self-driving cars and electric vehicles, Paterson said.

“Right now the auto industry is being massively disrupted and we’re trying to get ahead of that,” he said. “If the company doesn’t take bold steps to move to the new technology, then there won’t be any jobs.”

Dennis DesRosiers, of DesRosiers Automotive Consultant­s, said the decision was only a matter of time given the drop in production at the plant. Canada has passed its peak for car production, he believes.

GM production in Canada declined from a peak of one million units in 2007 to 330,000 projected for 2018.

“If there is a ‘canary’ out there it has been slowly dying for quite some time,” DesRosiers said.

“At its peak, total Canadian production across all companies was over three million units and lately we struggle to get two million units out of our remaining plants,” he said. “I am not saying that Canada will become Australia and eventually lose all its vehicle assembly operations, but there is more to come. I just don’t know which plants and when they will disappear.”

DesRosiers said Canada must invest to remain competitiv­e or it will see more closures. He said the workers and the union aren’t to blame, given uncompetit­ive labour costs were sorted out with the near bankruptcy back when Canada bailed out GM and Chrysler a decade ago. (That left taxpayers on the hook for $3.5 billion.)

Still, he said GM needed to make this tough decision to avoid another bankruptcy like it faced in 2009, when government­s bailed out the auto sector.

“Strangely, although this decision is devastatin­g for the workers at the plant and the suppliers feeding the plant it also shows the strength of GM in today’s automotive sector,” DesRosiers said.

The Oshawa plant, which made the Chevrolet Impala, Cadillac XTS and previous generation Silverado and Sierra trucks, contribute­d six per cent of total Canadian auto production. In Ontario, the auto industry accounts for about 2.5 per cent of the GDP without including spinoff industries, Porter said.

The news sent workers reeling, with some walking off the job Monday as their union, Unifor Canada, promised to fight for their jobs at the century-old facility.

Joanna Stojkovic, clutching her seven-month-old daughter, put down the phone after her GM worker husband passed on the news.

“Our livelihood is gone. We’re all in limbo right now,” Stojkovic said. “It’s a devastatin­g blow for all of Durham Region. GM has been around for a long time.”

Closure has loomed over Oshawa before, Unifor noted, but GM invested $500 million into the plant so it could build trucks as well. It launched the Silverado and Sierra lines in February, but those will also be discontinu­ed.

Martinrea Internatio­nal Inc. is one of the 100 suppliers to the Oshawa plant that will be affected by the closure.

Executive chairman Rob Wildeboer said 77 employees will be without work at its Ajax plant come 2020 unless something changes.

Wildeboer said he believes Canada will attract and maintain assembly plants based on overall competitiv­eness, including taxes and research and developmen­t funding.

The federal government’s announceme­nt for accelerate­d depreciati­on is a good move, he said, but this comes after years of added costs to the sector.

“What the Oshawa closing shows is that there’s work to be done to make us more competitiv­e in advanced manufactur­ing,” he added.

 ?? LARS HAGBERG / AFP / GETTY IMAGES ?? A union member reacts at a meeting of Local 222 in Oshawa Monday. GM says it will close the plant in a year.
LARS HAGBERG / AFP / GETTY IMAGES A union member reacts at a meeting of Local 222 in Oshawa Monday. GM says it will close the plant in a year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada