National Post

Workers critical to world’s food supply start to fall ill

Processors, farms brace for COVID-19

- LYDIA MULVANY, DEENA SHANKER AND ISIS ALMEIDA

Poultry giant Sanderson Farms Inc. on Monday reported the first case of a worker at a major U. S. meat producer testing positive for coronaviru­s. The employee and six more from the McComb, Miss., plant were sent home to self- quarantine, with pay, but operations continued.

A few days later Smithfield Foods Inc., the world’s biggest pork producer, confirmed a positive case at its Sioux Falls, S.D., facility. In all likelihood, the numbers will keep going up at meat plants, farms, warehouses and packaging plants across the globe.

The infections speak to a growing threat to the world’s food supplies. Massive operations where workers pick berries together, cut meat side-by-side on a production line or load warehouse trucks in sometimes close proximity risk slowing down. Some facilities may have to shutter for cleaning and worker quarantine­s. Produce could end up rotting in fields if there aren’t enough healthy workers.

“If we can’t flatten the curve, then that is going to affect farmers and farm labourers — and then we have to make choices about which crops we harvest and which ones we don’t,” said Al Stehly, who operates a farm in California, growing citrus crops, avocados and wine grapes. “We hope no one gets sick. But I would expect some of us are going to get the virus.”

To be clear, the food from a plant where infection pops up doesn’t pose health concerns because by all accounts COVID-19 isn’t a food-borne illness. Supplies from a farm or a production plant with a confirmed case can still be sent out for distributi­on.

And it’s important to note that so far there’s been no major interrupti­ons to food supplies. Inventorie­s are still ample, and major bottleneck­s have not yet developed in the supply chains, which tend to react quickly to changing situations.

Still, there is a risk to continued production. When a worker gets sick, the employee and every person they’ve come into contact with has to be quarantine­d. That could mean limited impact in some cases, like at the Sanderson plant, where the infected person’s work was contained to one small processing table. But the more employee mingling there is, the bigger the threat to production.

“One of our beef plants feeds 22 million people per day, so it’s vital that these plants stay open,” Dave Maclennan, CEO of Cargill Inc., the world’s largest agricultur­al commoditie­s trader, said in a recent interview.

At many meat- processing plants, workers are “essentiall­y elbow to elbow,” said Thomas Hesse, president of United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 401, the largest private sector union in Western Canada with 32,000 members, mostly in food processing and retailing. Though employees usually wear protective gear, the risk of contagion is difficult to completely eliminate.

“There’s underlying tension, there’s fear and there’s anxiety,” Hesse said, calling on employers to act more diligently to keep workers safe, including by increasing the space between work stations.

Moves like that would likely hamper output though. It’s a tricky balance, prioritizi­ng worker safety but also trying to meet the huge surge in demand the virus has unleashed. Grocery store shelves across the world are running empty as consumers load their pantries in anticipati­on of long lockdowns.

Just about every major agricultur­al and food producer is stepping up its sanitary procedures to keep workers from getting infected. Companies are enforcing hand washing, spraying down plants and break rooms and wiping down door knobs. Workers are covered in headto- toe protective gear, shifts are staggered and lunch breaks are taken alone.

It’s hard to say if all that will be enough. Given the real possibilit­y of an illness- driven labour crunch, some firms are stepping up hiring now to prepare.

Steve Cahillane, CEO of Kellogg Co., said bringing in additional workers is part of the company’s “mitigation plans,” without specifying how many have been added.

But it may not be that easy to lure people into the field. For all their import, these are not glamorous jobs.

Think of the back- breaking work of tomato pickers, the dangerous conditions at slaughterh­ouses and what many would consider the unpalatabl­e environmen­t of large livestock- feed operations. The wages are often low, benefits meagre and contributi­ons hidden from the public eye.

Now they’re putting their health at risk by keeping food flowing. Not surprising­ly, there’s been some backlash. Unions in South America have threatened to strike over safety concerns. And some poultry workers in the U. S. recently walked off the job.

Cargill, Maple Leaf Foods Inc., Campbell Soup Co., Mondelez Internatio­nal Inc., Kraft Heinz Co. and Hormel Foods Corp. are among those paying bonuses or premiums to workers.

In some places, more unusual solutions are being deployed. Dairy producers in Vermont put out a call asking for volunteers to come milk cows if farmers start falling ill. A day later, more than 80 relief milkers had signed on as standbys.

 ?? DANIEL ACKER / BLOOMBERG FILES ?? Just about every major agricultur­al and food producer is stepping up its sanitary procedures to keep workers from getting infected.
DANIEL ACKER / BLOOMBERG FILES Just about every major agricultur­al and food producer is stepping up its sanitary procedures to keep workers from getting infected.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada