National Post

Top pork producer fires back at critics

Misinforma­tion, false narratives, Smithfield says

- ELIZABETH REMBERT AND MIKE DORNING

One of America’s food giants is taking to the media to defend its efforts to keep employees safe and supply food to the nation, in the face of criticism that workers at meat plants haven’t been adequately safeguarde­d against the coronaviru­s.

Smithfield Foods Inc. took out a full- page ad in Sunday’s edition of the New York Times to accuse its critics of false narratives and misinforma­tion and to defend its operations to keep the nation fed during the pandemic.

America’s meat and poultry plants have been one of the hardest-hit sectors in the COVID-19 pandemic. More than 16,200 meat plant workers had tested positive for the virus by the end of May and 86 had died, according to a report by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that collected data from more than 20 states.

The Chinese- owned and Virginia- based company calls its 42,000 employees “heroes” in the ad, and says it has implemente­d measures to keep staff safe and reward them for their work.

Sunday’s spread echoes a national Tyson Foods Inc. commercial with the tagline “We take care of our family so you can feed yours.” In contrast to Tyson, Smithfield has declined to share recent data on coronaviru­s infections among employees at its plants.

Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren of Massachuse­tts and Cory Booker of New Jersey last month released responses from major producers as part of an investigat­ion into the spread of coronaviru­s at U.S. meat plants.

In its response, Smithfield was direct about why it wasn’t able to establish social distancing throughout its facilities.

“For better or worse, our plants are what they are,” chief executive Ken Sullivan said. “Four walls, engineered design, efficient use of space, etc. Spread out? OK. Where? To say it is a challenge is an understate­ment.”

Warren dismissed the advertisin­g campaign as an attempt to distract from its refusal to provide crucial informatio­n on workplace safety.

Danielle Rhoades Ha, vice president of communicat­ions at The New York Times, confirmed in an email the paper published Smithfield’s ad on page A17 of Sunday’s national and New York editions.

The ad accuses others of trying to use Smithfield and its industry as “political pawns,” while the company has stayed apolitical to make hard decisions and confront challenges that are “rooted in responsibi­lity and delivered with integrity.”

“We must produce food, and someone has to do it,” the Smithfield ad reads. “Certainly it is not the critics who have answered the bell. No, it is our nation’s food and agricultur­e workers who have done so.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada