National Post

PM not the ‘reset’ leader

Tory criticism gives him too much credit

- Chris Selley

Erin O’toole’s Conservati­ves are accusing Justin Trudeau of harbouring a very ambitious hidden agenda — not just for Canada but for the world. As part of a multinatio­nal effort, a petition launched by Conservati­ve finance critic Pierre Poilievre alleges, the Liberals want to “re- engineer economies and societies to empower the elites at the expense of the people.” They want to remodel Canada to fit the prime minister’s personal “socialist ideology,” Poilievre recently told the finance committee. O’toole, Poilievre and other Conservati­ves implore us all to stand up against and thereby thwart “the Great Reset,” which is the World Economic Forum’s term for a massive post-pandemic rethink of global priorities and relations.

The Great Reset proposes “the world … act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions.” There would, for example, be a multilater­al effort to “steer the market toward fairer outcomes” with measures like “wealth taxes, the withdrawal of fossil- fuel subsidies, and new rules governing intellectu­al property, trade, and competitio­n.” Trudeau has used the term “reset” in the context of a post- pandemic agenda — notably in his address to the UN General Assembly in September — and it’s easy to imagine he might support the Great Reset. But it seems he never has specifical­ly, or even uttered the term in public.

In turn, then, Liberals (including Trudeau at his Friday press conference) have accused Conservati­ves of traffickin­g in conspiracy theories,” or at least of trying to appeal to conspiraci­sts. It’s not an entirely unreasonab­le charge.

There is a tribe of disreputab­le yahoos adjacent to mainstream Canadian conservati­sm for whom the WEF’S Great Reset connotes a specific plan to unleash violent totalitari­an Marxism upon the entire world.

And Trudeau’s government plays a key supporting role in this fiction: A truly hilarious supposed “leaked” memo from a supposed member of the Liberals’ supposed “Strategic Planning Committee” has been making the rounds on the internet, warning that the government plans to buy all our personal debt (with cash from the Internatio­nal Monetary Fund) in exchange for our personal property and a mandatory vaccinatio­n regime. It’s bonkers, needless to say.

By the standards of political nose- stretchers, accusing Trudeau of supporting “the Great Reset,” as opposed to a broadly similar “reset,” hardly even registers. But there is no need to exaggerate at all to suggest Trudeau wants ( or wanted) to use the pandemic as leverage to change Canada rapidly in keeping with his pre- existing preference­s. He spent much of the summer declaring the country to be at a “crossroads.”

“This is our chance to accelerate our pre- pandemic efforts to reimagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality, and climate change,” he told the UN.

Mind you, there’s also more than enough in what Trudeau has done to suggest he’s not really that interested. It was said some version of this at- a- crossroads ambition would manifest in the October throne speech. It did not. It seems Trudeau and Friends determined Canadians weren’t much interested, and understand­ably so.

Resetters — including WEF founder Klaus Schwab — often compare the end of the pandemic to the end of the Second World War. It’s prepostero­us. On V- J Day, people celebrated the end of the second war in 25 years to have claimed something like three per cent of Earth’s population. Europe was a smoking ruin. Japan was a smoking radioactiv­e ruin. Six million Jews had been murdered. And unlike COVID-19, it was all created by human beings — mostly German ones, but still. If ever there were a moment for global self- reflection, that was it. This is not it. This is a time to get everyone vaccinated and back to arguing their visions for the country in good faith.

But of course, modern Canadian politician­s never do — not during wars, not during pandemics, not ever. If “Trudeau supports the Great Reset” is a conspiracy theory because he’s never said he supports it specifical­ly, then what is it when Liberals say “Andrew Scheer will recriminal­ize abortion” or “Doug Ford will destroy public health care,” when they have both sworn blind they won’t? The ludicrous fake Liberal memo’s imagined dystopia involves “deployment of military personnel into major metropolit­an areas.” That’s precisely what Paul Martin promised us Stephen Harper would do.

Indeed, the most absurd thing about Poilievre’s and O’toole’s allegation­s is the idea that Trudeau is ambitious or ideologica­l or committed enough to see the vision through. Trudeau is no socialist. He’s no -ist at all. He’s a slightly left-of-centre but otherwise entirely typical muddle- along Liberal, distinguis­hed from other such Liberals only by his echoing unseriousn­ess and thespian streak. His embryonic vision of a remodelled post- pandemic Canada was nothing but a trial balloon that he hoped voters would like. They didn’t, and he let it float away.

The Conservati­ves quite rightly say they want Trudeau to focus entirely on the pandemic.

They should do exactly the same.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada