Freeland sets up capital gains clash
Stand-alone bill forces Tories to take a position
• Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland intends to ask Parliament to approve proposed changes to capital gains tax rates in a standalone bill, which will force the federal Conservatives to take a position on the measure.
The most controversial announcement from her recent federal budget is not included in the motion she tabled Tuesday to introduce budget legislation in the House of Commons.
It includes many other measures announced in the April 16 spending plan, including the national school food program, updates to programs that help firsttime homebuyers and tax changes for people who own short-term rentals.
It does not say anything about the proposal to adjust the proportion of capital gains that get taxed, known as the inclusion rate.
Right now, the government taxes 50 per cent of capital gains, or profits made from the sale of assets, including stocks and secondary properties.
Freeland is proposing to increase that to two-thirds of all capital gains realized by corporations, and any amount in excess of $250,000 in one year for individuals.
The changes are expected to come in a separate piece of legislation.
Hiving it off will force opposition parties to take a specific position on capital gains, rather than a laundry list of budget policies that are subject to a single vote.
The federal Conservatives have not taken a position yet on the proposed capital gains tax changes, despite coming out against the budget overall.
On Tuesday, Freeland would not explain the absence of the capital gains tax changes in the proposed budget legislation.
She said the government needs to raise more tax revenue to pay for priorities like housing.
“Our view is it is absolutely fair to ask those in our country who are at the very top, to contribute a little bit more. And that is why we put forward a plan, which we are absolutely committed to, to increasing the capital gains inclusion rate,” Freeland said. “And I look forward to tabling implementing legislation.”
When asked point-blank if the reason was to force the Conservatives to take a position on the changes, Freeland said: “No.”