National Post (National Edition)

Politician­s know voters can be bought

-

If an election candidate in Canada were to hand out $100 bills to prospectiv­e voters, or promise to deliver the cash once safely elected, what do you suppose would happen? Correct. They would probably win.

Right-thinking voters might have answered that any candidate offering such blatant inducement­s would be arrested for bribery, or at least indignantl­y rejected by voters. And that might be the case, in the case of cash. But cheques evidently make it all OK.

As this newspaper reported Monday, in slightly over a year since assuming office, the Trudeau Liberals have made over 3,000 spending announceme­nts totalling $18.9 billion. Which is not in fact a cheesy $100 per Canadian, but a generous $540. And before anyone objects that it is the business of government­s to raise and spend money, note that these announceme­nts are rarely about, say, granting larger budgets to our emaciated military or finding some novel way to fund health care. They are mainly about delivering boodle to voters.

As Postmedia’s David Akin has catalogued, spending proclamati­ons are overwhelmi­ngly used to advertise specific benefits to specific ridings, like a new container terminal in Montreal or a refurbishe­d bowling alley in Tyne Valley, Prince Edward Island. And if you’re wondering why the federal government is fixing up a bowling alley, please reread the preceding paragraphs.

It is possible to argue that it is natural, even desirable, for government­s to publicize the things they do. After all, the basis of democracy is that good policies will be popular and bad ones will not. If not, why choose leaders by voting? But for such a system to work, citizens must take a public-spirited view of what constitute­s good policy, rather than calculatin­g how much booty just fell into their pocket or purse.

Not all government announceme­nts are bribes. One could defend $54 million in aid to Haiti out of simple humanitari­an concern. But far too many are in the category of perks: nice to have, but hardly essential to the national interest. Such as $150,250 for a new splash pad for kids in Torbay, NL, or subsidies for maple syrup producers in a New Brunswick riding that switched from Conservati­ve to Liberal in 2015. Indeed, of the nearly $100 billion the Liberals have pledged for “infrastruc­ture,” only about a third is for roads and bridges. The rest is: Vote for us and we’ll give you a skating rink or a subsidy.

The Trudeau Liberals did not invent this sort of conduct. Over the four years of their majority in Parliament, Conservati­ve MPs made no fewer than 7,307 such announceme­nts. And while the Liberals are getting more bang for the buck, averaging one announceme­nt for every $6 million in handouts — nearly eight announceme­nts a day including weekends — the Harper Tories needed just 72 days to proclaim $18.9 billion in goodies after winning the May 2011 election. And relabellin­g handouts “social infrastruc­ture” was a bizarre and harmful if slick leap into vote-buying disguised as social engineerin­g by supposedly frugal philosophi­cal conservati­ve advocates of limited government.

Such handouts are thrice cursed. They are bad for the government’s balance sheet. They sully our politics. And they undermine civil society. That splashpad in Torbay, for instance, is supposedly being built by the Kinsmen. It would be far better for community engagement if it were also funded by them.

One final way to attempt to excuse this farrago is to note that since everybody does it, nobody particular­ly benefits. But that’s surely an argument for eliminatin­g such blatant vote-buying.

Unfortunat­ely, no party can afford unilateral­ly to disarm here. Or rather, no party thinks it can. Although Trudeau’s Liberals denounced the Harper Tories’ 2015 “Canada 150” plan to subsidize sesquicent­ennial events as a reelection “slush fund,” they kept it going once elected, dipping in for over 200 PR-worthy gifts, mostly to Liberal ridings.

They won’t stop until we stop them by indignantl­y refusing to elect anyone who bids for our votes in broad daylight, certain we are openly for sale.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada