National Post (National Edition)

Trump’s energy lessons

- JOE OLIVER Joe Oliver is the former federal minister of natural resources and of finance and is currently a candidate for nomination of the Progressiv­e Conservati­ve Party of Ontario in York Centre.

President-elect Donald Trump is determined that America exploit its vast shale oil and gas reserves. The result will be an energy boom with global implicatio­ns, some especially problemati­c for Canada.

Hydraulic fracking has already had an immense impact on America’s economy. The Brookings Institutio­n reports that, from 2007 to 2013, energy consumers gained US$74 billion a year in lower energy costs brought by increased fracking. According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, between 2012 and 2014, energy developmen­t and lower energy costs generated US$3.5 trillion in GDP and 4.6 million new jobs. This despite a collapse in oil and gas prices.

The appointmen­t of pro-fossil-fuel climate skeptics to key positions in the new administra­tion sent a clear signal to the stock markets: Energy will be a key driver of jobs, economic growth and national security. Canada should draw two lessons from this looming tidal shift, both of which lead to the same policy conclusion.

The first lesson is that countries blessed with vast natural resources profit enormously when they have the common sense and resolve to develop them. That requires making the economy and the welfare of their citizens a priority. It does not have to mean sacrificin­g safety or environmen­tal protection. To the contrary, government­s should rely on independen­t regulatory recommenda­tions based on science and economics. But it does imply abandoning unsound policies grounded in ideology or failed political promises.

If political leaders explain what is at stake, a prodevelop­ment approach can marry appealing politics with good policy, which is why virtually every resourceri­ch country has taken that path, including the U.K., Australia and Norway. For the U.S., it presents as a dramatic reversal of President Obama’s focus on climate change as humanity’s existentia­l threat. But even under his watch, so much new drilling made the U.S. the biggest producer of oil and gas in the world. This raises a pressing question: Why is the Liberal government prepared to undermine Canada’s economy and jeopardize our standard of living on the altar of “moral leadership” on global warming when other countries are not doing their part and couldn’t care less what we do, and our sacrifice won’t make any discernibl­e difference to global temperatur­es?

The second lesson we must learn from this new American energy era is the need for a pragmatic response to an impending economic challenge. With the U.S. optimizing shale exploitati­on, our only customer for oil and gas will need less Canadian energy and even now is aggressive­ly pursuing markets for exports of its own liquefied natural gas and crude oil. In the first six months of 2016, the U.S. exported nearly 50 billion cubic feet of LNG, while B.C. continues waiting anxiously for its first LNG project. As we sell Americans our oil at discounts to the internatio­nal price amounting to billions of dollars every year, they sell American oil at higher prices abroad. In effect, we are subsidizin­g their exports. As if that isn’t bad enough, expensive, uneconomic green electricit­y is rendering Canadian industry less competitiv­e every day.

All this should be a serious concern for our prime minister. Unfortunat­ely, he is in denial. He characteri­zed Trump’s policies as an “extraordin­ary opportunit­y” for Canada to attract investors to opportunit­ies 10 to 20 years from now. To be charitable, that sounds like the triumph of hope over experience, given the negative capital reaction to the alternativ­e energy catastroph­e in Ontario and anti-growth tax and regulatory policies in Alberta.

Moreover, Trudeau opposed Northern Gateway after a positive regulatory review, ordered the closure of cheap-energy coal-powered electric plants by 2030, and imposed a moratorium on crude-oil tanker traffic off B.C.’s North Coast. He magnified the scope of regulatory reviews, made them longer, and politicize­d the process. Last month, he banned offshore oil and gas licensing in the Arctic, which Bob McLeod, premier of the Northwest Territorie­s, says holds seven billion barrels of oil and 92 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Meanwhile, Russia is drilling away in its half of the Arctic.

At the same time that the shale revolution is helping the U.S. win the energy war with OPEC, four Canadian provinces have imposed a moratorium on fracking. So here is a recommenda­tion guaranteed to provoke outrage. “Have not” provinces that refuse to develop their natural resources, preferring to leave energy developmen­t to other parts of the country to worry about, should have their equalizati­on payments reduced accordingl­y. We simply can no longer afford the luxury of feel-good but costly and baseless decisionma­king.

It is impossible to keep count of the billions our government­s are spending and foregoing in these muchvaunte­d green missions, which offer benefits no one can quantify.

While America roars ahead, our government nurtures a deluded sense of moral superiorit­y. In spite of massive deficits, it is confounded by slow growth and confronted with increasing­ly unaffordab­le health-care costs. It’s time to wake up to the world as it actually is. Reality bites.

 ??  ?? Fracking has had a huge impact on the U.S. economy. BRENNAN LINSLEY / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES
Fracking has had a huge impact on the U.S. economy. BRENNAN LINSLEY / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada