National Post (National Edition)

Trudeau sets new trend for PMs stumping in byelection­s

- DAVID AKIN

OTTAWA • In Calgary Wednesday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will confirm a unique pattern he began last fall in Medicine Hat, Alta., — a sitting prime minister who will jump right in and openly campaign for any underdogs flying the Liberal flag in a byelection.

Last fall in , in the southern Alberta riding of Medicine Hat-Cardston-Warner, the Liberals were handily beaten by the Conservati­ves and, the early line is that Conservati­ves should be able to count on easy wins April 3 when voters in the Calgary ridings of Calgary Heritage and Calgary Midnapore pick the MPs that will succeed Stephen Harper and Jason Kenney respective­ly.

Nonetheles­s, Trudeau is the star attraction at a Wednesday campaign rally in Calgary, a city which sent two Liberal MPs to Ottawa in the 2015 general election, an election that saw Liberal success in Calgary for the first time since another Trudeau swept to power in 1968.

Trudeau the Younger is not content to have simply a beach-head in Alberta, with two seats in each of Calgary and Edmonton.

“Albertans are tired of being taken for granted and they want a better option, and that’s exactly what we’re putting forward,” Trudeau said in Calgary. “We will not write off any corner of this country. That’s what I’m doing right here. That’s why I go to every byelection.”

While it is rare but not unheard-of for a sitting PM to stump in a byelection, Trudeau’s decision to campaign in Medicine Hat last fall and now Calgary has raised some questions for his own party — and his party’s opponents — about how to account for the costs of a campaignin­g prime minister.

Are taxpayers, for example, helping to pay for a campaignin­g PM? And what about election spending limits? Isn’t the expense of a prime minister’s tour — with all the security, special vehicles, additional prime ministeria­l aides — likely to be too much for the spending limits by which all campaigns must abide?

So far, the Liberal Party of Canada has satisfied itself that it will not only be doing right by the taxpayer but it will also be doing right by Elections Canada, the referee that enforces the election financing rules.

Indeed, the party’s compliance officer has what amounts to a ‘comfort letter’ from Elections Canada about some aspects of how the party is interpreti­ng what counts as an election expense for a campaignin­g PM and what does not.

Moreover, Braeden Caeley, the party’s communicat­ions director, says that, as far as the taxpayer is concerned, the party will reimburse the federal treasury for expenses such as hotels, meals, or airfare incurred as a result of the prime minister’s political activity.

Mind you, those airfare costs will be at the rate of equivalent economy airfare for a Calgary-Ottawa flight and not the $5,000-an-hour that the Department of National Defence says it costs to operate the RCAF Challenger executive jet that took Trudeau to Calgary and will take him back to Ottawa.

Canadian security agencies do not want prime ministers on commercial aircraft and prefer they use military jets and pilots. But that is not a hard-and-fast rule, particular­ly when there are elections. During a general election campaign, an incumbent prime minister — like other party leaders — will campaign using a chartered jet. The cost of that is borne exclusivel­y by political parties and not by the taxpayer.

Moreover, Trudeau, during his short time in office, has already flown at least twice on a non-military aircraft. As the National Post first reported, during his Christmas holiday, he and his family used the personal helicopter of the Aga Khan to make the 110-km journey between Nassau and the Aga Khan’s private island in the Bahamas.

If the party had to account for the full cost of flying Trudeau to Calgary and back on the Challenger — Trudeau has no publicly announced official events there other than the campaign appearance­s — the bill could easily top $35,000.

That would go against the national party’s anticipate­d spending limit of about $450,000 for the five by-elections currently underway. (In addition to the two in Calgary, there is one each in Markham, Ont., Ottawa, and Montreal.)

All federal parties do not have to report details of spending in any byelection in 2017 until June 30, 2018.

Campaignin­g prime ministers and campaignin­g party leaders are also exempt from the costs of the security detail assigned to protect them, Elections Canada has ruled. Those costs, be it during a general election or a byelection, come from the RCMP’s budget which, in turn, comes from the government’s general revenue fund.

Stephen Harper never campaigned publicly in any of 29 byelection contests held during the nine years while he was prime minister. But he did show up in a 2010 byelection in Winnipeg North with a brief appearance at the Conservati­ve candidate’s headquarte­rs.

That 2010 appearance, though it was captured on a video posted to YouTube, was not public, no reporters were invited to witness it let alone even told about it, and Harper spoke only to campaign staff and not to voters.

The Conservati­ve Party later claimed a “miscellane­ous expense” that day of about $450.

The party did not respond Monday to questions about expenses associated with Harper’s 2010 byelection appearance.

Harper, though, had been in Winnipeg that day for some other business associated with this official duties as prime minister.

Neither Paul Martin nor Jean Chrétien are believed to have campaigned in byelection­s. Former political staffers for Brian Mulroney can recall him campaignin­g in by-elections at least three times in the nine years he was prime minister. Pierre Trudeau also stumped for his candidates in some byelection­s.

THAT’S WHAT I’M DOING. THAT’S WHY I GO TO EVERY BYELECTION.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada