National Post (National Edition)

Emails often base for terminatio­n

- HOWARD LEVITT Financial Post Howard Levitt is senior partner of Levitt LLP, employment and labour lawyers. He practises employment law in eight provinces. Employment Law Hour with Howard Levitt airs Sundays at 1 p.m. on Newstalk 1010 in Toronto.

EWorkplace Law ven the best legal argument is only as strong as its weakest link. An employee suing for wrongful dismissal may have a stellar employment record. That is, until the employer discovers her penchant for circulatin­g disparagin­g emails about her employer.

As I frequently tell my employer clients: It takes only one good ground to terminate an employee for cause; you just need to secure it.

In 2017, that ground is often found in an email. Often some innocuous, apparently innocent correspond­ence sent to a colleague can lead to an employee’s undoing.

Although workplace emails are hardly new, many employees still approach their work email accounts as their personal soap box, sending email to colleagues disparagin­g that employee everybody despises; email disparagin­g management or their employer; email with inappropri­ate comments and images; emails containing confidenti­al informatio­n; and vast quantities of personal email sent during business hours.

There is one common denominato­r in all of this — it’s all fodder for an employer building a case for terminatio­n.

Employees should be cognizant of what they put in writing, because here is the simple truth: Your work email account does not belong to you. It belongs to your employer, along with the emails you send and receive from it.

As a simple rule, if you wouldn’t feel comfortabl­e with your employer reading your work emails, you shouldn’t be sending them. If you’re the recipient of inappropri­ate emails, you’re best protection is to write that individual and tell them to stop sending them to you.

It is not merely terminated employees who can expect their employer to review the emails they have sent. Employer software flagging inappropri­ate words or employers just checking what certain targeted employees are up to.

And don’t presume that a single act of indiscreti­on will go unnoticed. Not anymore.

There is an entire industry of document retrieval known as e-discovery, dedicated to scouring millions of documents, searching for that one smoking gun. If there’s something to be found, your employer will likely find it. In fact, e-discovery has become such an integral part of the litigation process that I now have a lawyer at my firm who works in it full-time.

That doesn’t mean that management and executives enjoy impunity. On the contrary, management is often the face of the business and obliged to set the “tone from the top.”

They are held to an even higher standard than their subordinat­es. Moreover, if management is circulatin­g inappropri­ate emails, it will be difficult to discipline a subordinat­e for doing the same.

So what’s the solution? It is often difficult to terminate an employee for circulatin­g inappropri­ate emails without defining what “inappropri­ate” means. The best defence for employers is a code of conduct. Ensure the code succinctly and unambiguou­sly states what employees can and cannot write, what they can and cannot circulate, and that violating the code is cause for dismissal.

Email’s immediacy makes it an effective workplace tool. It also makes it dangerous. The next time you’re looking to engage in some witty email flirtation, take a moment and ask yourself, before you hit the send button: What would my employer think? The answer just might save your job.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada