National Post (National Edition)

Nova Scotia LNG mega-projects ramp up as producers look east

Cancellati­on of B.C. facilities a boon for east

- BRETT BUNDALE The Canadian Press

HALIFAX • Two liquefied natural gas megaprojec­ts slated for Canada’s East Coast are steaming ahead, even as investors pull the plug on plans for the West Coast.

Bear Head LNG Corp., a subsidiary of Australiab­ased Liquefied Natural Gas Ltd., and Goldboro LNG, a Pieridae Energy Canada project, could be the best bet for the country’s first LNG export facility.

Despite a glut of gas around the world, rock-bottom prices and the cancellati­on of facilities proposed for British Columbia, the two multibilli­on-dollar Nova Scotia projects appear to be ramping up.

Bear Head’s pitch starts with location. When the company was scouting locations in Atlantic Canada for an LNG facility, the upshot on Point Tupper, N.S., was unequivoca­l.

“It was the site that God built for LNG,” Paul MacLean, the firm’s strategic and regulatory affairs adviser, recalls an industry insider saying about the Cape Breton site.

Perched on the Strait of Canso, it’s the deepest ice-free terminal on the North American eastern seaboard. And when Bear Head’s parent company purchased the site for US$11-million, it came with infrastruc­ture: A jetty, roads, water and electricit­y.

“One of the biggest costs for an LNG facility tends to be infrastruc­ture,” Texasbased chief executive officer and managing director Greg Vesey says in an interview in Halifax. “That makes us more competitiv­e right out of the box.”

Since buying the site in 2014, progress on the proposed $5-billion LNG megaprojec­t has been hog-tied by a wildly competitiv­e energy market, including in its own backyard.

About 100 kilometres southwest of Point Tupper is Goldboro, N.S., the site eyed by Pieridae Energy for an LNG processing facility, storage tanks and marine works.

The project, expected to cost US$7-$10 billion, aims to tap into the natural gas supply from the existing Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline — without the cost of building pipe to Point Tupper, for example.

“It’s why we chose the Goldboro site,” says Mark Brown, director of project developmen­t for Pieridae Energy. “We’re interconne­cted with all the other pipeline networks in North America and that gives us supply options from many different supply basins in both Canada and the United States.”

It’s also a different project than what Bear Head has on the table for Point Tupper, he says.

“We’re an integrated project, so we’ll have the capability to invest in upstream reserves and pipeline capacity,” Brown says. “In other words, we’ll become a shipper on pipelines as opposed to Bear Head, which is what’s known as a tolling facility.”

Goldboro LNG is also the only export facility in North America with a customer, he adds. Uniper SE, a German energy firm, has signed a 20 year off-take agreement for half of Goldboro’s permitted output, a coup for the project.

While executives with the two competing Nova Scotia LNG proposals say they hope their competitio­n succeeds, they also quietly one-up each other.

“We have different models, both utilizing an excess of natural gas,” Brown says. “But the fundamenta­ls of the projects are different in that we have a customer taking the gas.”

Vesey with LNG Ltd. says he respects the efforts by Goldboro LNG, but says “they have a long way to go on permitting, which is expensive and takes time.”

Both blockbuste­r hydrocarbo­n-energy projects could face resistance from environmen­tal groups, a tightening regulatory environmen­t and unpredicta­ble market forces.

Still, the cancellati­on of projects planned for B.C. could bode well for the East Coast proposals. Global energy giant Petronas and its partners killed a massive LNG project planned for B.C. in late July, while the Aurora LNG project slated for northwest British Columbia was cancelled earlier this month.

The dimming prospects on the West Coast could slowly shift attention to the Goldboro and Bear Head projects.

As Western Canadian gas producers take stock of their options, what once seemed like a potentiall­y risky venture — signing a long-term deal on a long-shot East Coast terminal — has emerged as an alternativ­e to shipping gas west.

Vesey assesses the uptick in interest cautiously, noting that producers banking on shipping gas west are still “shell shocked” at the cancellati­on of B.C. projects.

“The West Coast to Asia is the be-all and end-all,” he says. “You can’t beat that.”

But building pipe over mountains and other difficult terrain to the West Coast, market headwinds and a galvanized opposition have created a tough environmen­t for B.C. projects, and Bear Head is ready to step in as a back up. “Interest has ramped up since the cancellati­on of NorthWest LNG,” Vesey says. “I think there is still more interest growing.”

Toronto-based independen­t energy consultant Tom Adams has said if the market is not attractive enough to get British Columbia — positioned close to Asian markets — into the LNG business, then “Nova Scotia is just not even worth talking about.”

But Vesey says with natural gas forecasts showing an increase in prices around 2023, producers need to start inking deals now.

INTEREST HAS RAMPED UP SINCE THE CANCELLATI­ON OF NORTHWEST LNG.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada