National Post (National Edition)

Nike moves to tear up its own playbook

Aiming to sell directly to consumers

- KYLE STOCK Bloomberg

NEW YORK • Nike Inc. started cleaning up its stats sheet Tuesday. For the first time, the sneaker empire declined to report “future orders,” a critical measure of wholesale demand from the galaxy of retailers who sell the famous kicks. It says the metric doesn’t matter much anymore, because now it’s focused on doing business directly with consumers and cutting out the middleman.

While Nike reported its slowest quarterly sales growth since 2010, its performanc­e as a retailer-rather than a wholesaler-was a relative highlight. Sales on Nike’s own web store were up 19 per cent in the recent quarter, while its retail locations notched a 5 per cent gain in same-store sales. CEO Mark Parker said the company is obsessed with making shopping more personal. “Retailers who don’t embrace distinctio­n will be left behind,” he warned on a conference call Tuesday.

Still, that wasn’t enough to impress investors.

The overlooked beauty of bricks-and-mortar retail is how well retail chains lend themselves to what economists call price segmentati­on — shoemakers can easily target customers by sending the right shoes to the right kind of store (think: firstclass vs. coach, iPhone X vs. iPhone 8, Banana Republic vs. Old Navy). In Nike’s case, it ships expensive, limited edition sneakers to high-end boutiques, routes its stock Jordans to chains like Foot Locker, and dumps its lowend product and off-key colorways in places like DSW.

Done correctly, all this socioecono­mic slotting moves as much merchandis­e as possible with minimal fuss while not tarnishing the larger brand. And Nike does it correctly.

On its face, it’s a design shop supercharg­ed by the kind of storytelli­ng its TV commercial­s, billboards, and magazine ads are famous for. But Nike’s real genius isn’t marketing, it’s merchandis­ing — knowing exactly what to ship where. For every sneaker-sketching savant at the Beaverton, Ore., headquarte­rs, there’s a mid-level manager with a giant spreadshee­t making sure the new “Momofuku” Dunks shoes aren’t too easy to find, ordering a special design for China, distributi­ng its bestseller­s to all the right Dick’s Sporting Goods and dumping plenty of Chuck Taylor’s at outlet malls.

But now Nike is upsetting its own well-oiled applecart. In giving traditiona­l retail the stiff-arm, which Nike made official in June, the Oregon empire is tearing up that playbook and trying to make an end run around the basic economics of price segmentati­on. The strategy-a bold move, given the historical manufactur­er-to-retail model it’s discarding-requires no shortage of swagger. But Nike’s numbers show that the bet appears to be working, because Nike has been sharpening its digital game.

Sought-after sneakers now ship out via Nike’s own ecosystem of apps, including SNKRS, which it launched early last year. The heart of its lineup meanwhile sells on Nike.com and in its own bigbox stores. As for the cheaper and less popular kicks, they quietly trickle into the company’s “factory” stores (read: outlet) and onto Amazon. com. Nike even has a studio in New York that makes customized shoes on-site in about an hour.

In short, the company is de-emphasizin­g its readymade network of retailers to create an even more precise targeting mechanism. On Sept. 26, Parker said the end goal is to get ahead of the consumer and offer “the most personal, digitally connected experience­s” in the industry. “While changing your approach is never easy, Nike has proven before that when we do, it’s always ignited the next phase of growth for our company,” he explained.

In theory Nike can know any customer better, and their willingnes­s to pay, by using its own venues and platforms, particular­ly on its digital properties. The challenge will be building the mechanism to sort the data — and the customers. In the real world, they sort themselves-the high-end boutique isn’t right next to the cut-rate discount outlet. In the virtual world, it’s not so easy.

Under Armour is slightly ahead of Nike, with 31 per cent of sales coming directly from consumers; Adidas is slightly behind with 23 per cent of revenue from retail. At its current pace, Nike will soon be collecting one in three of its sales dollars directly from consumers. Its challenge will be making sure none of them gets too good of a deal. At its current pace of ditching its traditiona­l model, Nike will soon be collecting one in three of its sales dollars directly from consumers.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada