National Post (National Edition)

End Beijing’s bullying of Taiwan

- SCOTT SIMON National Post

China began 2018 with a breach of longstandi­ng arrangemen­ts for aviation safety in the Taiwan Straits. On Jan. 4, the Civil Aviation Administra­tion of China (CAAC) unilateral­ly opened up northbound civil flights on flight path M503 and three connecting east-west extension routes, in violation of a mutual agreement negotiated in 2015 between the Taipei Airlines Associatio­n and the China Air Transport Associatio­n.

China has a right to declare flight routes on the west side of the “median line,” a boundary imposed by the United States in the 1950s to prevent conflict between China and Taiwan. Nonetheles­s, an increase in flight travel in the 180-kilometre wide strait is unsafe because it places civilian aircraft immediatel­y adjacent to zones used by Taiwan’s air force. Because it is so close to the Taipei Flight Informatio­n Region, moreover, Taiwan’s civil aviation authoritie­s should have been consulted in advance for the sake of regional security and public safety.

Ever since China’s 19th party congress, President Xi Jinping has taken advantage of the distractio­ns of the North Korea missile crisis and a weakened America to advance his own expansioni­st agenda in the South and East China Seas. At the end of 2017, the Chinese Liberation Army Air Force conducted a series of high-profile exercises circumnavi­gating Taiwan. These exercises took Chinese bombers between the Japanese islands of Okinawa and Miyako, thus infringing upon Japanese territory.

Taiwan (as well as Japan and South Korea) had already peacefully acquiesced in 2013 when China unilateral­ly declared its new “East China Sea Air Defence Identifica­tion Zone” over their territorie­s. China’s gradual hemming-in of Taiwan’s air space makes it difficult for Taiwan’s air force to carry out the patrol and training activities needed to protect their country. Since China is the only country that threatens Taiwan, this is a dangerous breach of the status quo. The United States has encouraged the two sides to engage in constructi­ve dialogue.

China is rapidly developing military capacity to threaten Taiwan and prevent the kind of foreign interventi­on that has preserved peace in the past. Defence specialist­s thus see these changes in aviation routes as part of a salami-slicing strategy that, through seemingly small and harmless moves, that could ultimately make it difficult for Taiwan to defend itself.

Canada has a strong interest in promoting peace and aviation security in the region. There are 28 weekly flights connecting Taipei to Vancouver and Toronto, including daily non-stop flights on Air Canada. There are more than 200,000 visitors annually between the two countries, which share an agreement on visafree travel. Some 60,000 Canadians live in Taiwan. Business travel is important because Taiwan is Canada’s fifth largest trading partner in Asia and 11th in the world. Taiwan is a democratic country and shares common values with Canada. Any Chinese unilateral change to the status quo is thus destabiliz­ing in the region and threatens Canadian interests.

Canada has strong internatio­nal clout in aviation, especially since Montreal is the headquarte­rs of the Internatio­nal Civil Aviation Organizati­on. At the very least, Canada can discreetly encourage China to resume cross-straits dialogue without imposing impossible conditions that alter the status quo. If direct crossstrai­ts negotiatio­ns are not possible, Canada may have to recognize that China and Taiwan have separate aviation administra­tions and propose that both sides attend future ICAO meetings. In our age of accelerate­d global travel, aviation security needs to be ensured through dialogue with all stakeholde­rs rather than by unilateral action. Canadian interests are thus best served by addressing this issue in support of Taiwan as quickly and as boldly as possible. An F-16 jet fighter of the Taiwan air force takes off from a highway in an exercise simulating an attack from China.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada