Only one right choice for the navy

In 2014, Canada lost its last two refuelling supply ships, HMCS Protecteur by fire, and HMCS Preserver as a result of corrosion. Consequently, for the past three years, the navy has been unable to effectively deploy a task force and its ability to protect our shores has been limited. This loss reduces mission options, curtails the radius of action for the navy’s warships and erodes skills.

Without at-sea resupply and refuelling capabilities, the navy is unable to do what the government needs it to do. This includes protecting our trade routes, preventing smuggling, providing humanitarian and disaster relief, enforcing domestic laws, projecting force and supporting our allies.

After losing the Preserver and Protecteur and being left without backup, everyone down to the most junior sub-lieutenant knows Canada needs four supply ships — two on each coast. Having four refuellers provides the necessary buffer for required maintenance, training and unforeseen accidents so that at least one ship is always available on both the Pacific and Atlantic to support a naval task force.

Last spring, both the Senate and the Commons Defence committees looked at the existing naval capability gap as it relates to support ships and agreed unanimously that this needs to be fixed — now.

So how is our government responding to this situation?

Timing: On Nov. 7, 2017, Andy Smith, Deputy Commissioner of the Canadian Coast Guard, testified before a parliamentary committee that Seaspan would not finish its first four vessels for the Coast Guard until 2023, and only then will it start on the supply ships. These new refuellers will not join the fleet until 2026 and 2028 — which means Canada will have experienced another 10 years of risk without the navy being able to effectively protect Canadians.

Costs: The government has set aside $2.6 billion for the new supply ships but like the Arctic Offshore Patrol Ships, there is no mechanism such as a fixed-price contract to control spending. The Parliamentary Budget Office, whose estimates often prove better than the government’s, has indicated that it is likely the costs will be as high as $4.13 billion if the two ships are going to be built at Seaspan as planned. This is a staggering price tag given that Davie, a Quebec shipyard, has just completed building a more capable vessel for a quarter of the price and is offering to build others with fixed-price contracts.

Compliance: On top of all this, Seaspan is using a 26-year-old German design (why so old?) that currently does not meet NATO interoperability standards. Surely it can find a more modern design that meets NATO’s needs?

In 2015, the government accepted a proposal from Davie to provide Canada with a supply ship, the MV Asterix, a 26,000-tonne vessel that meets all of the requirements of the government, the navy and NATO.

Since the establishment of the National Shipbuilding Strategy, Davie is the first shipyard to deliver a vessel to the navy on time and on budget — and without any of the $500 million in subsidies provided to Seaspan and Irving to upgrade their facilities. For a fixed price the government can acquire all four supply ships the navy needs from Davie for the $2.6 billion that it has set aside, and have one ship on each coast by 2019 and the two additional ships three years later.

This is a better option than spending twice as much for two ships with a 26-year-old design that will not be available for 10 years.

Moreover, there is a real capability gap that creates an unacceptable security risk for Canadians. The shocking reality is that the Minister of Defence has failed to come up with a solution to having both the Atlantic and Pacific fleets dysfunctional for the next 10 years because they lack effective resupply capability.

The government needs to move decisively and build the next three supply ships at the Davie yard and get Seaspan going on the longdelayed polar class icebreaker for the Canadian Coast Guard. This will protect the jobs at Seaspan while providing Canada with the capability to effectively resupply its naval fleet for the next 40 years. Furthermore, it will save taxpayers billions of dollars and reduce the risk to Canadians by ensuring the navy has the supply vessels it needs sooner rather than later. HMCS Protecteur is retired in May 2015. Without at-sea refuelling and resupply, the navy cannot do its job, Colin Kenny writes.