National Post (National Edition)

POLITICAL CORRECTNES­S IS GNAWING AGGRESSIVE­LY AT THE LANGUAGE.

- National Post cbletters@gmail.com

for “worrisome,” and “impact” as a verb, let alone emitted the noise “impactful” (all now current usage), we would have been energetica­lly caned. Such rough occurrence­s were frequent, though not in my case for reasons of abuse of the language, but the adolescent­s of my cohort have not attracted sympathy for the severity of our residentia­l schools. I am not at all nostalgic for school days; that era of education had many failings, including excessive teacher-student violence (as a parent myself, I was a complete shower as a disciplina­rian), but in those people to grow up and learn, but uncorrobor­ated sexual allegation­s that come from anonymous sources and destroy peoples’ careers are often almost as ancient as McGregor’s antics at Frank (which he predictabl­y claims not to remember).

This week, TV Ontario personalit­y Steve Paikin was accused by businesswo­man and politician Sarah Thomson of inappropri­ate conduct. Both are friendly acquaintan­ces of many years, Steve a perfect gentleman, and Sarah a reformed aventurier­e. I believe she leads a convention­al married life now, but when I first met her nearly 20 years ago she was magnificen­tly concupisce­nt, and in large groups, such as a crowded party at the home of my delightful and talented colleague Christie Blatchford, Sarah candidly volunteere­d that she was unsure if she had slept with various of the other men who appeared. She offered to do me if I would give her an interview and I declined but commended her on her initiative. She was different and refreshing and when she ran for mayor in 2010, I gave her my endorsemen­t in this column from the fulcrum of municipal influence where I then resided, a U.S. federal prison in Florida. On this issue, Steve is more credible. The denunciati­on is not made with cowardly anonymity, but another good man cannot be taken down on an unsupporte­d denunciati­on over a trivial complaint, from an estimable person, but in these matters, not an unblemishe­d source.

The majority of people are tired of the extreme inhibition­s of political correctnes­s, but most modern societies have been so self-brow-beaten over past mistreatme­nt of ethnic, gender, religious or behavioura­l minorities, our society has been atomized into a legion of complainan­t groups, competing fiercely for official sympathy and reparation­s. It will be seen that one of Donald Trump’s benefactio­ns has been to reject this tendency. Even my Jewish wife is delighted to hear our American friends say and send cards reading “Merry Christmas” and I suspect even many Muslims are slightly relieved to have an American president and Secretary of State who call Islamist extremism by its rightful name. All groups must be respected and everyone must be treated equally and all have a right not to be despised because of these immaterial (to their rights and worth as people) distinctio­ns. Slightly changing O Canada is innocuous enough, but no sane woman felt herself excluded by the previous wording, or the original male-only French wording, least of all the-then head of the British world, Victoria, queen and empress. Political correctnes­s is, by its nature, oppressive. We can overthink these things; the world’s most magnificen­t national anthem, France’s glorious La Marseillai­se, attributes “male accents” to Liberty, and demands that France “water our countrysid­e” with “the impure blood” of invaders.

In all these matters, we should lighten up a little. Canadians are a well-regarded nationalit­y. But nowhere and by no one have we been thought a barrel of laughs since Ed Sullivan used to split his sides laughing at Wayne and Shuster in the 67 appearance­s they made on his television program.

Inadverten­tly Christine Elliott was not named in this column last week about the Ontario PC leadership. She is certainly qualified to be leader and I much liked and admired her late husband, Jim Flaherty. As she ran unsuccessf­ully last time, I think of her as more of the past than the future in leadership terms, but she is certainly a strong and plausible candidate. I apologize to Ms. Elliott and wish her well.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada