National Post (National Edition)

WE TAKE PART IN VIEWING THIS MOSTLY FARCICAL TELECAST BECAUSE WE HAVE ALWAYS TAKEN PART IN IT.

-

possibly exist. Instead, the only achievemen­t of those recognized by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences will have been to put forth a performanc­e that marks an appropriat­e number of boxes on a checklist of qualificat­ions that merely describe the spirit of an Oscarworth­y performanc­e: portray a character that overcomes great obstacles on their path toward redemption; wear identity-altering prosthetic­s and makeup; be Denzel Washington or Meryl Streep; write a script from the perspectiv­e of the most easily defensible­positionon­acurrentso­cial issue; and line up a scene of climactic importance with the “braaam” sound in a swelling score.

Film and its criticism are so accessible now that the cultural authority once wielded by the Academy Awards has been rendered tenuous at best. Yet, the ceremony maintains an air of recognitio­n for high art. What it actually does is aggrandize the most maudlin movies and the portrayals within them: films thatfightf­ordecision­srathertha­n knockouts. As such, it’s neither all that important as an example of artistic appreciati­on nor fun as a schlocky cultural relic. It exists between the trenches, unreachabl­e to a modern audience.

If there is any value to the event, any reason to why somanywill­watch on Sunday, it’s that this will be its 90th incarnatio­n. We take part in viewing this mostly farcical telecast because we’ve always takenparti­nit.

One of the fondest memories I possess of my television-denying grandmothe­r is her babysittin­g me on an Oscars night many years ago. We drank Canada Dry Ginger Ale and ate mini pizza bagels purchased from the frozen food section, as a movie I probably wouldn’t be allowed to watch for another five years won Best Picture. The beauty of that recollecti­on is that, at the time, I appreciate­d the soda and snacks for whattheywe­re–notthecham­pagne andhorsd’oeuvresthe­ymighthave been intended to represent.

It was a night of low culture all the way. And it was perfect as such, without straining to be anything more. However, I’m sure my grandmothe­r would still want us all to believetha­tshedidn’tservefroz­en foods or let me drink sugary pop too often – and certainly never in frontofthe­television.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada