National Post (National Edition)

Cuarón’s Children of Men still stokes terror

- J. HOBERMAN

Grimly dystopian yet bursting with cinematic brio, Alfonso Cuarón’s Children of Men (2006) is a film that, set in 2027, feels like the present day — only more so. It could almost have taken the title of Anthony Trollope’s 1875 novel, The Way We Live Now.

The movie — showing Friday and Saturday at midnight at the IFC Center in New York City in a good 35-millimetre print — opens in a dank, despoiled Britain ruled in the name of Homeland Security. Murderous gangs plague the countrysid­e. Refugees are kept in cages. A bomb explodes on a busy London street even before the movie announces its title. “The world has collapsed,” the TV reports, but “Britain soldiers on.”

This collapsed future world, as imagined in P.D. James’ 1992 speculativ­e fiction, is also a world that has no future. Human fertility has vanished. The species is dying even faster than the Earth. It’s been 18 years since the last baby was born. Indeed, the movie opens with mass mourning for the world’s youngest person, who has been killed.

The protagonis­t, Theo, played by Clive Owen, is a low-level bureaucrat and depressed former activist drawn back into the struggle after agreeing to help a resistance group led by his expartner, played by Julianne Moore. (Chiwetel Ejiofor is another member.) Theo’s mission is to get transit documents for a young woman (Clare-Hope Ashitey) who, miraculous­ly pregnant, needs to be smuggled out of the country.

With this quest, Children of Men becomes a dark and bloody magical adventure, played out in cozy woodland hideouts and hellish concentrat­ion camps populated by the human equivalent­s of hobbits, wizards and orcs. Shot by the distinguis­hed Mexican cinematogr­apher Emmanuel Lubezki, the movie has several jaw-dropping long takes (or apparent long takes) that don’t stop the action with their choreograp­hed virtuosity but only enhance its accelerati­on. One is a jolting, gory automobile chase as seen from inside the pursued car; the other, even more amazing, has Theo dash from a nightmare of a prison camp into a free-fire zone, trying to protect a newborn.

No less than Cuarón’s Gravity, another technologi­cal tour de force, Children of Men is an evident religious parable. Life is not only fragile but violently transitory. Few popular movies are so predicated on sudden death and irrevocabl­e loss, while still offering the promise — or illusion — of hope. There is a bit of Andrei Tarkovsky in Cuarón’s redemptive vision and a measure of self-mocking millennial­ism, too. It’s not any movie that, already steeped in ’60s rock, can use John Lennon’s anthem Bring on the Lucie (Freda Peeple) under its end credits.

Reviewing Children of Men in The New York Times, Manohla Dargis called it “the kind of glorious bummer that lifts you to the rafters.” I was similarly taken with the movie when it opened without much fanfare on Christmas Day 2006. Seen again 11 years later, Children of Men seems already a 21st-century classic.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada