National Post (National Edition)

Doubting Raps back in vogue

- Sstinson@postmedia.com Twitter.com/Scott_Stinson

After winning their 11th game in a row March 16, DeMar DeRozan and the Raptors have lost five of eight, including two to LeBron James’ Cavaliers.

But even as Canada’s NBA team was basking in the rare admiration from across the border and even as it was sitting with a 52-17 record and a seeming chokehold on the top playoff seed in the East, there was a lot of hedging going on.

That compliment­ary ESPN piece noted “something special might be happening” and was headlined “The Raptors might be real and only getting better.” Other pieces included caveats about previous April misadventu­res and even Barkley, not normally one for nuance, included in his endorsemen­t that “the only team that can beat them (in the East) is Cleveland because you have to beat them four times in a week.”

I know what you are thinking: what does any of this have to do with a time machine? Nothing, really. The thing about a two-week time machine is it is good for shorting stock because the U.S. president is about to launch a trade war with China and also for a basketball analysis.

On that latter point, there is this: as much as it is starting to feel like the roof has utterly caved in on the Raptors — having lost five of eight since March 16, including two to the Cavaliers, before Wednesday’s showdown with Boston — it also remains that even if this present swoon had never occurred, there were going to be doubts about this team. They are evident in all the ifs and buts that were being thrown their way even as they were dismissing all comers with ease. That the doubts have landed at their feet a little earlier than expected isn’t a huge developmen­t: they were always going to have to prove people wrong.

The doubts come from two places: their own past failures in the playoffs and the looming presence of LeBron James, king of all he surveys, but especially the Eastern Conference.

Both reservatio­ns are understand­able. Amid all little the praise in mid-March, some analysts suggested Toronto’s reputation as a playoff nose-diver was undeserved. The team has won more post-season games than anyone other than Cleveland and Golden State over the past two years after all. That’s a charitable outlook. Even if you wave away the 2014 first-round loss to a veteran Brooklyn team, the Raptors were swept in the first round the following year and struggled mightily in 2016. In that post-season, every time it looked like the Raptors had found their footing against a weaker opponent, they let them back into the series. Then another first-round struggle last year against Milwaukee and a thumping from Cleveland, which takes a small asterisk because Kyle Lowry went down with an injury. The best evidence the Raptors underperfo­rmed came from their own management, which kept the core intact, but blew everything else up, including the team’s style of play. The question of whether this group, armed with that new style, could perform better in the playoffs is the same today as it was in October and will be two weeks from now.

The James conundrum will be even harder to solve. His Cleveland team is the weakest group he has led in a decade and was blown up itself at mid-season, but James and 11 NBA players chosen at random would be a formidable playoff force. That’s not an exaggerati­on for comic effect. He’s that good. James could take any team in the East to seven games with his left hand in a plaster cast. (Maybe a mild exaggerati­on. Six games.)

Should the Raptors meet the Cavs in the post-season, home-court advantage would be a huge asset, given their struggles at Quicken Loans Arena. Even with it, Cleveland could very well be the favourite, which hardly ever happens in the NBA.

But we are getting ahead of ourselves with those specific doubts. Whoever they end up playing when the post-season begins, the Raptors will first have to answer the doubts about themselves.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I have a time machine to enter and some stocks to short. nationalpo­st.com

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada