National Post (National Edition)

U.S. urges judge to stop AT&T bid for Time Warner

Deal must be altered if not cancelled: DOJ

- Diane Bartz Reuters

WASHINGTON • In its final push, the U.S. Justice Department has urged a federal judge to stop AT&T Inc., which owns biggest pay TV provider DirecTV, from buying movie and TV show maker Time Warner Inc. ,orat least cut a big chunk out of the proposed US$85 billion transactio­n.

U.S. District Judge Richard Leon is expected to rule on the deal on June 12.

In filings sent to the court last week and unsealed on Tuesday, the Justice Department reiterated that if AT&T owned Time Warner it would have the incentive and opportunit­y to withhold CNN, HBO and live sports from pay TV companies like Charter Communicat­ions.

The government also said it would have the incentive to refuse to license its networks to cheaper online TV distributo­rs, like Hulu since these cheaper services bite into pay TV revenues.

The government estimated the increased cost to industry rivals at US$580 million a year and asked in its post-trial brief that the deal be deemed illegal and stopped.

The government said Leon could order AT&T to sell an asset — either DirecTV, with more than 20 million subscriber­s, or Time Warner’s Turner channels.

“The evidence demonstrat­ed that the bulk (though not all) of the anticompet­itive effects flow from the combinatio­n of Turner with DirecTV,” the Justice Department said.

AT&T said in its final brief, which was available last week, that the judge should reject any request by the government to force it to sell DirecTV or Turner, claiming it would “destroy the very consumer value this merger was designed to unlock.”

AT&T and Time Warner also said the deal would help them compete with internet titans like Facebook and Netflix. “The government did not even begin to make a credible case that the merger would likely harm competitio­n, substantia­lly or even just a little,” AT&T said. “This is not a close case.”

AT&T argued that Time Warner’s licensing fees from pay TV and online distributo­rs were too valuable for the company to forego.

AT&T also sought to assuage critics by offering to submit any disagreeme­nt with distributo­rs over pricing for Time Warner’s networks to third-party arbitratio­n and to promise not to black out programmin­g during arbitratio­n for seven years.

The government dismissed the offer as “halfbaked” since it covers only the Turner channels, not HBO.

Leon asked few questions during the trial, but asked witnesses several times if they felt the arbitratio­n proposal was adequate.

The deal, announced in October 2016, was quickly denounced by Donald Trump, who as a candidate and later as president has been critical of Time Warner’s CNN.

Before the trial started, AT&T lawyers said the Time Warner deal may have been singled out for government enforcemen­t but Leon rejected their bid to force the disclosure of White House communicat­ions that might have shed light on the matter.

 ?? ALAN DIAZ / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES ?? The U.S. government estimates AT&T’s purchase of Time Warner Inc. would result in an increased cost of $580 million per year for industry rivals.
ALAN DIAZ / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES The U.S. government estimates AT&T’s purchase of Time Warner Inc. would result in an increased cost of $580 million per year for industry rivals.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada