National Post (National Edition)
Hawaiians ask: Am I covered for volcanoes?
HONOLULU • Patricia Deter moved from Oregon to Hawaii to be closer to her two daughters, but the Kilauea volcano burned down her home only a month after she bought it.
Now Deter and her family, along with others who have recently lost homes to the lava-spewing mountain, are on an urgent quest for answers about insurance, desperate to learn whether their coverage will offer any help after molten rock wiped out most of what they owned.
The eruption has destroyed about two dozen homes in the Leilani Estates subdivision on the Big Island. On Monday, another fissure spewing lava and toxic gas opened up, and a crack in the earth that emerged a day earlier was sending molten rock crawling toward the ocean, officials said. Nearly 20 fissures have opened since the volcano started erupting 12 days ago, and officials warn it may soon blow its top with a massive steam eruption that would shoot boulders and ash miles into the sky.
Because the community sits in a zone deemed by the U.S. Geological Survey to have a high risk of lava, few insurance firms will issues policies there. But homeowners are not without options. One is the Hawaii Property Insurance Association, a non-profit collection of insurance firms created by state lawmakers in 1991 to provide basic property insurance for people unable to buy coverage in the private market.
The horror of seeing houses turned to ash has motivated some people who went without insurance to scramble to purchase a policy. The association announced last week it would issue policies to uninsured homeowners in the affected area — but they will have to wait six months.
Some homeowners believe fire coverage will suffice for homes burned by fire from the lava. And a list of frequently asked questions from the Hawaii Insurance Division supports that idea, saying that lava damage may be covered “as a fire peril.”
However, there are exceptions. Judy Moa, a broker who specializes in catastrophic coverage for Hawaii, said if a policy specifically excludes lava damage, then a policy’s fire coverage would not apply.
Some homeowners forgo policies that include lava coverage because they can cost more than US$3,000 per year,saidmoa.
Todd Corrigan and his wife left their Leilani Estates home on May 4 after a magnitude-6.9 earthquake knocked belongings off their shelves. That jolt convinced them it was time to evacuate.
Corrigan said the most stressful part might be the uncertainty about what insurance will cover. His policy will pay for damage from a fire but not from lava. His insurer also cautioned him that it will not cover damage if he
WORRY ... WHEN TRYING TO DEAL WITH EVERYTHING ELSE.
has not been at home for 30 days. That requirement could be a problem if he is gone for a long time.
“You have to worry about that stress when you’re trying to deal with everything else,” Corrigan said.
Deter’s daughters live in the same area as their 88-year-old mother. They know the eruption risks, so they made sure their mother’s home was covered by a policy that included lava.
The family’s Hawaii-based insurance agent assured daughter Vickie Pruitt that her mother’s house was fully covered for lava. But an adjuster on the U.S. mainland told them it looked like the damage was from the earthquake—notthelava—and that the home would not be covered. “I’m like, ‘What?’” Pruitt said. “I’m laughing hysterically. But it’s not funny. It’s tragic.”