National Post (National Edition)

Trump omits key point in tariffs row

- Stuart thomson National Post, with files from The Canadian Press sxthomson@postmedia.com

The disastrous G7 summit that ended with the U.S. accusing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of “betrayal,” kicked off with complaints from U.S. President Donald Trump about Canadian milk.

“Canada charges the U.S. a 270% tariff on dairy products! They didn’t tell you that, did they?” Trump tweeted on Friday.

On farm subsidies and tariffs, Trump is right. But he’s throwing stones from a multi-billion dollar glass house.

It’s true that Canada holds tight reins on the amount of dairy products produced in the country, which keeps prices high for domestic sellers — and customers.

To fend off lower-priced foreign products, Canada also limits imports with hefty tariffs: nearly 300 per cent for butter and cream, and 240 per cent for cheese, whole milk and yogurt.

Economists have criticized the program, which was a flashpoint in recent Conservati­ve and Liberal leadership races. When Andrew Scheer edged Maxime Bernier for the Conservati­ve Party’s leadership, Bernier blamed a highly motivated cadre of milk producers for his loss. In 2013, Martha Hall Findlay argued against supply management while running for the Liberal leadership.

So Trump’s arguments against dairy subsidies and government aid are something Canadians have heard before, and something on which many surely agree — but what he doesn’t mention is U.S. farmers are also awash in subsidies. U.S. farmers received about $17.2 billion in subsidies in 2016, according to Environmen­tal Working Group, an organizati­on that has tracked farm subsidies since 1995. That amounts to about $349 billion since the database was created.

Although politician­s in both countries like to talk about family farms, the libertaria­n Cato Institute says the largest 15 per cent of farm businesses received about 85 per cent of the subsidies in the U.S., meaning they “redistribu­te income upwards.”

By a long way, U.S. corn growers come out on top. About half a million producers receive nearly $6.5 billion in various subsidies. Soybean producers are in second place, with about $2.3 billion.

Dairy producers — the subject of Trump’s consternat­ion in Canada — are way down the list, receiving about $10.5 million, although the money is shared among fewer than 5,000 producers.

Trump has made hay by attacking Canadian farm subsidies and ignoring the money doled out in the U.S. but that spending has been controvers­ial for as long as Congress has been writing farm bills. But despite increasing urbanizati­on and a dwindling number of farmers each year, the farm lobby in the U.S. has successful­ly fought off reform attempts.

In 2008, Congress overrode a presidenti­al veto on farm legislatio­n that boosted subsidies, meaning twothirds of its members had to OK the bill. The Reagan administra­tion proposed cuts in the 1980s but, in the wake of an agricultur­al downturn, quickly reversed itself and boosted aid to farms.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada