National Post (National Edition)

Big Tobacco can act

- Stan Shatenstei­n, Montreal

Re: Imperial Tobacco ‘shocked’ by Health Canada’s proposal for plain packaging of cigarettes, June 26

Imperial Tobacco says it’s “shocked and confused” by the government’s proposed regulation­s mandating plain packaging for cigarettes and other tobacco products. What’s truly shocking is that a company responsibl­e for fully half this country’s annual 45,000 entirely preventabl­e, premature smoking-related deaths has the gall to continue complainin­g and to even threaten to take the government to court.

Imperial should just quietly keep counting its bloodsoake­d money and also count itself fortunate that its products are so addictive that they can’t be banned outright. Prohibitio­n is not realistic, even if tobacco’s toxicity would make it entirely warranted, but any regulation­s the government wishes to impose, and that are based on the best available evidence, are worth adoption without Big Tobacco’s input.

It’s also worth noting that, while Imperial laments “a number of provisions that are basically impossible to comply with,” the industry said the exact same thing when Canada was on the verge of setting a world precedent by introducin­g graphic warning labels in 2001. Health groups quickly found printers who could do the job, putting the lie to the firms’ complaints. Canada is not the first when it comes to plain packs, but the draft regulation­s are rigorous and set a number of global precedents. They should be saluted, not challenged by the industry whose unconscion­able actions have made them necessary.

 ?? SEAN KILPATRICK / THE CANADIAN PRESS ??
SEAN KILPATRICK / THE CANADIAN PRESS

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada