National Post (National Edition)

‘DO POLITICS DIFFERENTL­Y,’ BERNIER’S SPEECH,

-

On Thursday afternoon in Ottawa, Beauce MP Maxime Bernier announced he is leaving the Conservati­ve Party of Canada with the hope of launching a new party of his own. Below is the full text of his speech:

“Over the past few months, I have been raising policy issues which I believe are crucially important for the future of our country. This is my job as a Member of Parliament.

Moreover, it is my duty, as a Conservati­ve Member of Parliament, to contribute to debates and to offer policy solutions from a conservati­ve perspectiv­e. Otherwise, what is the point of being involved in politics?

I am in politics to defend ideas, real conservati­ve ideas. Because I passionate­ly care about Canada’s future. Because I know that the free-market conservati­ve philosophy has the best solutions to ensure our society is more prosperous, secure, and peaceful.

However, my party’s stand on several issues have convinced me that under the current leadership, it has all but abandoned its core conservati­ve principles.

I still cannot understand how a party that is supposed to defend free markets supports a small cartel that artificial­ly increases the price of milk, chicken and eggs for millions of Canadian consumers.

More importantl­y, supply management has become one of the main stumbling blocks to an agreement with the United States on NAFTA. Former Conservati­ve leaders Brian Mulroney and Rona Ambrose agree that it should be put on the table.

But the Conservati­ve Party has been siding with the Liberal government. It also supports the retaliator­y tariffs of the Liberal government, even though this is going to hurt our businesses and consumers. Even though Canada has no realistic chance of winning a trade war with a neighbour 10 times larger. Even though we could successful­ly relaunch the negotiatio­ns if we put supply management on the table, and if we accept President Trump’s offer to negotiate a dismantlin­g of all barriers, as the European Union has done.

The Liberals are playing politics with this crucially important trade file. They are endangerin­g the 20 per cent of our economy that depends on trade with the U.S., and Canada’s future prosperity.

But instead of leading as a principled Conservati­ve and defending the interests of Canada and Canadians, Andrew Scheer is following the Trudeau Liberals. I was told that internal polls are showing that the Liberals’ response to Trump is popular. And that in six months, if the polls change, the party’s stand may change, too.

The same thing happened in reaction to my tweets on diversity and multicultu­ralism. This is another crucial debate for the future of our country. Do we want to emphasize our ethnic and religious difference­s, and exploit them to buy votes, as the Liberals are doing? Or emphasize what unites us and the values that can guarantee social cohesion?

Just like in other Western societies grappling with this issue, a large number of Canadians, and certainly the vast majority of Conservati­ves, are worried that we are heading in the wrong direction. But it’s not politicall­y correct to raise such questions.

Instead of leading the debate and pushing back against all the unfair accusation­s, Andrew Scheer chose to avoid the controvers­y. He and several of my colleagues disavowed me. They are so afraid of criticism by the Left and the media that they prefer to let down millions of supporters across the country who would like us to tackle this issue.

When the Liberal government recently renewed the unfair and inefficien­t equalizati­on formula for another five years, I was the only one to criticize it. Not a word from my Conservati­ve colleagues.

A Conservati­ve party that supports free markets should also advocate the end of corporate welfare. It is not only the principled thing to do, it could also be popular if we defend it in a consistent way. Canadians are tired of paying taxes to bail out Bombardier, Ford and other businesses.

Instead of taking up this idea, Andrew Scheer announced that he would name a regional minister for all the regional developmen­t agencies in the country, as opposed to having only one minister overseeing them as is the case now. He wants a minister from Quebec to distribute subsidies to Quebec, a minister from Atlantic Canada to distribute subsidies to Atlantic Canada, and so on.

The conservati­ve solution should be to abolish these wasteful agencies. What my party proposes is to make them more efficient at buying votes with taxpayers’ money.

How can we expect this party to adopt any conservati­ve reform when it comes to power, if it cannot even articulate a clear stand and defend them before it is elected? I am now convinced that what we will get if Andrew Scheer becomes prime minister is just a more moderate version of the disastrous Trudeau government.

I have come to realize over the past year that this party is too intellectu­ally and morally corrupt to be reformed.

I know for a fact that many in the caucus privately oppose supply management. But buying votes in a few key ridings is more important than defending the interests of all Canadians.

The whole strategy of the party is to play identity politics, pander to various interest groups and buy votes with promises, just like the Liberals.

The Conservati­ve Party tries to avoid important but controvers­ial issues of concern to Conservati­ves and Canadians in general. It is afraid to articulate any coherent philosophy to support its positions.

Every public declaratio­n is tested with polls and focus groups. The result is a bunch of platitudes that don’t offend anybody, but also don’t mean anything and don’t motivate anyone.

Andrew Scheer keeps talking about his “positive Conservati­ve vision.” But nobody knows what that vision is.

The Conservati­ve Party has abandoned conservati­ves. It does not represent them anymore. And it has nothing of substance to offer Canadians looking for a political alternativ­e.

If we want conservati­ve principles to win the battle of ideas, we have to defend them openly, with passion and conviction.

That is what I want to do. And this is why as of today, I am no longer a member of the Conservati­ve Party of Canada. I want to do politics differentl­y. I will find another way to give a voice to millions of Canadians. And I will continue to fight for Freedom, Responsibi­lity, Fairness and Respect.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada