Reinstatement ‘easiest way out’ for banned Russia

Anti-doping critics concerned about Thursday’s vote

MOSCOW • Should Russia be reinstated without publicly admitting wrongdoing for its statesponsored doping scheme?

That question has caused ferocious infighting at the World Anti-doping Agency, the watchdog body tasked with stopping any repeat of the widespread drug use and coverups that tarnished a sporting superpower.

WADA’S board is due to vote on the issue Thursday in the Seychelles. If it votes yes, it might push the International Association of Athletics Federations, the world track and field governing body, to welcome back Russia, too.

Russia’s anti-doping agency RUSADA was suspended in November 2015 when a WADA report found top athletes could take banned drugs with near impunity since RUSADA and the national laboratory would cover for them. Later investigations found evidence that dirty samples were switched for clean ones when Russia hosted the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi.

The reinstatement of RUSADA is championed by WADA president Craig Reedie, who has softened two key conditions for Russia, and the move has the tacit backing of the International Olympic Committee.

But despite a recommendation for reinstatement from a key WADA committee, it has provoked anger from other anti-doping figures who feel Russia can’t be trusted to reform without accepting more of the blame.

Athletes on one of WADA’S own commissions, Russian doping whistleblower Grigory Rodchenkov and the WADA vice-president Linda Helleland lead the opposition.

“I am afraid that by opting for the easiest way out, it will ultimately hurt WADA in the future,” said Helleland, a Norwegian politician who is eyeing a bid to replace Reedie as the organization’s president.

Reedie softened his stance on Russia “in the spirit of compromise,” as he wrote to Russian Sports Minister Pavel Kolobkov in June.

That means dropping a demand for Russia to accept a report that accused it of directing the doping and instead allowing it to accept an IOC document with milder conclusions. Reedie deemed it satisfactory after Kolobkov said he “fully accepted” the IOC report and Russia won’t be expected to make any public statement or address exactly who in the vast state sports structure was to blame.

Critical of the move toward reinstating RUSADA, Rodchenkov said Russia’s priority is “protecting their top-level apparatchiks who destroyed the Olympic Games in Sochi.”

WADA’S Reedie also accepted Russia can be reinstated without providing some key evidence from the Moscow laboratory at the centre of the allegations. Instead, Russia promises to deliver it only after it’s reinstated.

Russian law enforcement and President Vladimir Putin haven’t changed their argument that the main guilty party was WADA’S star whistleblower Rodchenkov. Russian law enforcement has alleged that he tricked clean Russian athletes into taking drugs for unclear reasons, then faked evidence of abuses at the Sochi Olympics.

Rodchenkov is in hiding in the United States, while other whistleblowers like runners Yulia Stepanova and Andrei Dmitriev have been vilified at home after reporting abuses by teammates. They say they have been forced to leave Russia for their own safety.

Putin ordered his own investigation in 2016 and some sports ministry officials, including thendeputy sports minister Yuri Nagornykh, were suspended. However, that investigation never reported any public conclusions and the officials quietly resigned later that year. Vitaly Mutko, who was sports minister during the Sochi Olympics, was swiftly promoted to deputy prime minister.

It’s largely a symbolic battle for RUSADA, but could set a precedent in track and field, where Russia has been suspended since 2015. RUSADA’S reinstatement is one of the conditions the IAAF set before it would allow Russia’s team back to full strength rather than its current neutral status.

That status means Russian track and field athletes cannot compete in international competitions under the Russian flag and have to be cleared as independent athletes.

If Russia is listed as compliant, WADA is also likely to drop its recommendation that the country shouldn’t be awarded hosting rights for new competitions. Some major sports have already flouted that measure without any apparent consequences.

The small world of anti-doping officials may be in an uproar, but all is calm at RUSADA.

A WADA decision last year quietly restored almost all of the agency’s powers without a formal reinstatement since the number of test samples taken in Russia had plummeted. Speaking earlier this month, RUSADA CEO Yuri Ganus said just about the only effects of Russia’s “non-compliant” status were extra monitoring of the agency’s work and problems asking for assistance from foreign agencies.

RUSADA is on track to be among the most active agencies in the world this year after collecting 7,013 samples in the first eight months of 2018. That’s almost as many as RUSADA did in the runup to the Sochi Olympics, when it was accused of routinely “saving” dopers.

WADA said this time the Russian test results can be trusted.

PAVEL GOLOVKIN / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Yuri Ganus could see his Russian anti-doping agency welcomed back by WADA after Thursday’s vote.