National Post (National Edition)

PLUS CONRAD BLACK ON SEPARATISM’S RETURN,

CANADA HASN’T NOTICED, BUT QUEBEC NATIONALIS­M IS COMING BACK

- Conrad BlaCk National Post cbletters@gmail.com

Canada is very late and very laconicall­y beginning to consider the implicatio­ns of the Quebec election on Oct. 1. If, on Monday night, as polls indicate, 40 per cent of Quebecers have voted for overtly separatist parties (Québec solidaire and the Parti Québécois) and 30 per cent for a party that declines to say separation is undesirabl­e, only that it will not hold a referendum (Coalition Avenir Québec, or CAQ), no one should imagine that this is not a threat to this country. I have written here before that Canada would regret the refusal of Stephen Harper and Justin Trudeau to discuss methods of reintegrat­ing Quebec into the Constituti­on, which would not have solved the problem permanentl­y, but would have greatly strengthen­ed federalism.

The issue of separatism appeared to die, but that is the nature of Quebec nationalis­m: it never dies, it just becomes comatose for a time. And though almost no one yet describes this Quebec election in these terms, the governing Liberals of Premier Philippe Couillard seem to be about even at 30 per cent with François Legault’s moderate left, constituti­onally ambiguous CAQ. Legault was long an explicit separatist, and has not renounced that view (and his wife, Isabelle Brais, thinks English Canada has no culture and should have no status in Quebec). The Quebec Liberal party, like the British Columbia Liberal party, is really a LiberalCon­servative coalition. It governed very efficientl­y these past four years, but became an ecological­ly obsessed and eccentric regime. While it retains the support of most of the non-French, it is now pulling only a very unfeasible 17 per cent of the French Quebec vote.

Though the CAQ has been slipping, it has been losing ground to Québec solidaire, a rabidly separatist party that proposes immediate, unconditio­nal secession. It is led by a declared Marxist who opposes the right of the State of Israel to exist, and, astonishin­gly, it may hold the balance of power in the National Assembly. It threatens to pass the original separatist PQ of former premiers René Lévesque, Jacques Parizeau and Lucien Bouchard, which hasn’t changed its tune but is whistling it more softly. The independen­ce of Quebec has not been much raised in the campaign, but the implicatio­ns of the emerging voting patterns assure that it will reemerge.

The old rule of thumb was that the Quebec vote was divided into five approximat­ely equal blocs: non-French, French Liberal federalist­s, French Conservati­ve federalist­s, nationalis­ts and a floating vote. The Liberals have almost always had virtually all the first two blocs, and always had the advantage. Under the Union Nationale of Maurice Duplessis and Daniel Johnson, the conservati­ves and nationalis­ts voted together, a coalition requiring artistic skill to assemble and maintain, and they won six elections between 1936 and 1966. Lévesque, Parizeau and Bouchard got the nationalis­ts, the floaters and a sprinkling of conservati­ves and Liberals and won four elections between 1976 and 1998. During the past two Quebec elections, and the polls suggest during this one, the nationalis­ts appear to have grown to 35 to 40 per cent and the French-speaking Liberals and Conservati­ves to have been divided between the Liberals and CAQ .

Most Canadians, no matter what happens, will not sit on the edges of their chairs again and worry about what Quebec wants or does, and that province’s importance to Canada has certainly diminished since the rise of the explicit separatist movement in the mid-1970s. At that time, Quebec had almost 30 per cent of Canada’s population (22 per cent now), and the whole idea of that province seeking sovereignt­y with continued associatio­n was a radical challenge to the serene and noiseless tenor of Canadian political continuity. It was widely assumed to be an attempt by the Quebec nationalis­ts to eat their cake and still retain it — to continue to receive transfer payments, or at least the benefit of a common currency and trading area with Canada, while exchanging embassies with the world and joining the United Nations. Even the Quebec Liberal premier of the time, Robert Bourassa, said in Paris in 1975 that he was seeking and achieving “A uniquely sovereign, entirely French Quebec in a Canadian common market.” This was less than a ringing endorsemen­t of the Canada most Canadians could recognize.

The separatist PQ won anyway with Lévesque in 1976 and the long-promised referendum of 1980 asked Quebecers to authorize the Quebec government to negotiate the independen­ce of Quebec from Ottawa with continuing freedom of trade and movement with Canada. Pierre Trudeau led the federalist­s with Jean Chrétien and the-then Quebec Liberal leader Claude Ryan, former publisher of Le Devoir, as his chief collaborat­ors. The federalist­s won 59.6-40.4 per cent in a turnout of 86 per cent of the voters. The French-speaking vote was split about evenly. Trudeau had promised a charter of rights and a constituti­on of Canada to be amended in Canada, and he delivered that, with considerab­le difficulty and without the agreement of Quebec (which took great umbrage but had not, in fact, been bargaining in good faith), in 1981. Brian Mulroney came to office in 1984, and Lévesque opted for the “beau risque” of trying to renegotiat­e within Confederat­ion with the Mulroney government. Lévesque was purged by the party he founded, Bourassa made one of Canada’s more noteworthy political comebacks, the Meech Lake constituti­onal settlement of a partial decentrali­zation was agreed, but blew up after Bourassa invoked the Notwithsta­nding Clause to revoke a Supreme Court decision defending bilinguali­sm in Quebec, and the Trudeau-Chrétien forces attacked the arrangemen­t as making too many concession­s to the provincial government­s.

The Charlottet­own agreement on a substantia­l decentrali­zation, put to a countrywid­e referendum in 1992, was defeated by 54 per cent of Canadians, though it had been approved by the federal parliament and all the provincial legislatur­es. Bouchard, Mulroney’s most prominent Quebec MP, deserted the government, founded the separatist Bloc Québécois, and led the 1995 referendum campaign in Quebec after Parizeau was elected premier. It was a slightly more explicit separatist question than Lévesque had posed 15 years before. Chrétien was over-confident, mishandled the campaign, and gave a slightly panic-stricken appeal to Quebec voters on referendum-eve. It was 50.6 to 49.4 per cent for the federalist­s, a clear separatist victory for the French Quebecers, and the turnout was 93.4 per cent.

Chrétien somewhat redeemed himself with the Clarity Act of 1999, based on the results of a Supreme Court referral, which held that any secession had to be on the basis of a substantia­l majority supporting a clear referendum question to secede. (I was one of those who urged that the Act also provide that any county in a seceding province that had voted not to secede and was contiguous to another province, should secede from the province and remain in Canada. My precedents, though I never got to cite them, were West Virginia and Ulster.) Lucien Bouchard lost interest in the idea of independen­ce, and the Liberal party has governed in Quebec for 13 of the past 15 years. The present premier, Couillard, is the most unambiguou­sly federalist Quebec premier since Jean-Jacques Bertrand in 1970, and it will not be long before he is missed by those in Ottawa who declined to discuss these issues with him. If he is out on Monday night, Couillard’s successors will blow a cold wind on Ottawa and across Canada just as the Trudeau government appears to be set to break up the relationsh­ip with the United States, and our automobile industry prepares to repatriate to the U.S. Justin might do better as the next leader of the Quebec Liberals.

DURING THE PAST TWO QUEBEC ELECTIONS, AND THE POLLS SUGGEST DURING THIS ONE, THE NATIONALIS­TS APPEAR TO HAVE GROWN TO 35 TO 40 PER CENT AND THE FRENCH-SPEAKING LIBERALS AND CONSERVATI­VES TO HAVE BEEN DIVIDED BETWEEN THE LIBERALS AND CAQ. — CONRAD BLACK

 ?? JOHN MAHONEY / POSTMEDIA NEWS FILES ?? Election posters for Parti Québécois candidate Carole Vincent and Liberal Enrico Ciccone in the Marquette riding covering Lachine and Dorval, west of Montreal. Voters go to the polls Monday in the provincial election.
JOHN MAHONEY / POSTMEDIA NEWS FILES Election posters for Parti Québécois candidate Carole Vincent and Liberal Enrico Ciccone in the Marquette riding covering Lachine and Dorval, west of Montreal. Voters go to the polls Monday in the provincial election.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada