Military trials ruled a violation of Charter

Supreme Court asked to stay decision

OTTAWA • Canada’s military justice system is in danger of being blown up following a bombshell court ruling that found the current process of trying service members for serious crimes — including sexual assault and murder — violates their charter rights.

The ruling was quietly rendered last week by the military’s appeals court, and prosecutors are now scrambling to save the current system by asking the Supreme Court of Canada to stay the decision until it can make its own determination.

But even as some inside the Canadian Forces warn about the damage the ruling would cause if it’s allowed to stand, others say it’s long overdue — and should spark a much-needed overhaul of the system.

The case in question dates back to December 2014 when military police charged an Edmonton-based soldier, Master Cpl. Raphael Beaudry, with one count of sexual assault causing bodily harm.

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms says anyone accused of a crime with a maximum sentence of five or more years can request a trial by jury — except in cases involving military law tried before a military tribunal.

But a special provision in the National Defence Act, which regulates the Forces, says civil cases such as sexual assault and murder can be considered military law even if the alleged offence was not related to an accused’s military service.

As a result, when Beaudry asked that his case be heard by a jury, it was denied and he was found guilty via court martial. But in a majority ruling last week, the Court Martial Appeals Court found that “civil offences are not offences under military law” — meaning Beaudry and others charged with serious criminal code offences should be allowed to stand trial by jury.

The ruling, endorsed by two out of three members of the military appeals court, does not affect such militaryspecific offences as desertion and disgraceful conduct, nor does it apply to crimes committed by service members while deployed outside Canada.

But it does leave dozens of criminal cases currently in the military justice system relating to sexual assault and similar common offences in limbo.

The military’s top prosecutor, Col. Bruce MacGregor, has asked the Supreme Court to suspend the Beaudry decision until the top court can hear an appeal. A failure to do so, he added in a motion filed to the top court, could have widespread implications. “Forty cases currently in the military justice system are affected by this decision, representing over half of our average annual caseload,” MacGregor wrote in his motion requesting a stay.

Retired colonel Michel Drapeau and retired judge Gilles Letourneau insist the ruling will not affect the military’s ability to enforce order and discipline.