National Post (National Edition)

U.S. slogging through historic constituti­onal crisis.

- Conrad Black

The most immense and dangerous public scandal in American history is finally cracking open like a ripe pomegranat­e. The broad swath of the Trump-hating media that has participat­ed in what has amounted to an unconstitu­tional attempt to overthrow the government are reduced to reporting the events and revelation­s of the scandal in which they have been complicit, in a po-faced hohum manner to impart to the misinforme­d public that this is as routine as stock market fluctuatio­ns or the burning of an American flag in Tehran.

For more than two years, the United States and the world have had two competing narratives: that an elected president of the United States was a Russian agent whom the Kremlin helped elect; and its rival narrative that senior officials of the Justice Department, FBI, CIA, and other national intelligen­ce organizati­ons had repeatedly lied under oath, misinforme­d federal officials, and meddled in partisan political matters illegally and unconstitu­tionally and had effectivel­y tried to influence the outcome of a presidenti­al election, and then undo its result by falsely propagatin­g the first narrative. It is now obvious and indisputab­le that the second narrative is the correct one.

The authors, accomplice­s, and dupes of this attempted overthrow of constituti­onal government are now well along in reciting their misconduct without embarrassm­ent or remorse because — in fired FBI director James Comey’s formulatio­n — a “higher duty” than the oath they swore to uphold the Constituti­on compelled them. Or — in fired FBI deputy director Andrew Mccabe’s words — “the threat” was too great. Nevermind that the nature of “the threat” was that the people might elect someone he and Comey disapprove­d of as president, and that that person might actually serve his term, as elected.

The extent of the criminal misconduct of the former law enforcemen­t and intelligen­ce chiefs is now notorious, but to make the right point here, it has to be summarized. The fact that the officially preferred candidate lied to federal officials about her emails and acted in outright contempt of Congress and the legal process in the destructio­n of evidence, was simply ignored by the FBI director, who announced that she would not be prosecuted, though he had no authority to make that determinat­ion.

The dossier of salacious gossip and defamatory falsehoods amassed by a retired British spy from the lowest grade of intelligen­ce sources in Russia, commission­ed and paid for by the Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee, was circulated to the media by high public officials and cited in illegal and dishonest applicatio­ns to authorize surveillan­ce of the campaign of the other presidenti­al candidate. A special counsel was empowered on the false pretext of the necessity to get to the bottom of Trump-russian collusion in the election, of which there was and remains no evidence, because it did not occur and was a complete partisan fabricatio­n.

The special counsel then packed his staff with militant Clinton partisans, and acted very late and only when his hand was forced by the media to remove two officials who referred in texts to each other to the Bureau’s ability to smear and provoke the impeachmen­t of the winning candidate as “an insurance policy” against his filling the office to which he was elected.

Large sections of the media colluded with the Democratic campaign and produced the doctrine that anything was justifiabl­e, no matter how dishonest, to destroy the incoming president’s reputation and damage him in public opinion polls to legitimize attempts to remove him from office. Large sections of the media deliberate­ly deluged the public with stories they knew to be false about the new president and referred to him in terms of unpreceden­ted vituperati­on in what purported to be reportage and not comment.

This unorganize­d but widespread campaign of defama- tion was taken up by a great number of ordinarily newsworthy celebritie­s and was accompanie­d by false, unresearch­ed stories denigratin­g President Trump’s supporters, such as the false claims about Catholic school students’ treatment of an elderly Native American and the false claim that actor Jussie Smollett had been beaten up and reviled by Trump supporters. The former intelligen­ce chiefs of the nation under president Obama repeatedly have accused this president of treason, the most heinous of all crimes, and have asserted with the authority of their former positions that the Russians determined the result of the 2016 presidenti­al election. They knew this to be entirely false.

The special counsel has failed to find any evidence of the collusion and electoral interferen­ce that was the justificat­ion for establishi­ng his inquiry, and the Democrats are already expressing disappoint­ment in his failure to produce such evidence when the leading Democratic members of congressio­nal investigat­ive committees still roboticall­y claim to have at least prima facie evidence of such collusion.

The dishonest attempt of much of the opposition and what even left-leaning mediamonit­oring organizati­ons record as 90 per cent of the national media, continued for more than two years to try to condition the country to believe that the president had committed the “high crimes and misdemeano­rs” required by the Constituti­on for impeachmen­t and removal from office.

The special counsel, apart from smearing the president, distracted public attention from or tended to justify the ever more evident misconduct of the president’s enemies. And we now know that Comey, despite his “higher duty,” lied to the president about his not being a target of an FBI investigat­ion, illegally leaked to The New York Times the contents of a self-serving memo he purloined from the government, and lied to Congress by claiming 245 times in one sitting to be ignorant of recent matters that no one of sound mind could have forgotten.

And now we have Andrew Mccabe’s proud confirmati­on that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein not only continued the illegal counterint­elligence investigat­ion of President Trump, but actively discussed methods of securing his removal from office by deliberate misuse of a variety of laws, including the Emoluments Clause, the 25th Amendment to deal with mental incompeten­ce, and the Logan Act of 1799, which has never been used successful­ly and has not been tested in 150 years.

This entire monstrous travesty is finally coming apart without even waiting for the horrible disappoint­ment of the special counsel’s inability to adduce a scrap of evidence to justify his replicatio­n of Torquemada as an inquisitor and of the Gestapo and KGB at rounding up and accusing unarmed individual­s who were not flight risks. The collapse of this grotesque putsch, under the irresistib­le pressure of a functionin­g attorney general and Senate committees that are not hamstrung by Nevertrump­ers, will cause a revulsion against the Democratic Party that will be seismic and prolonged.

The disgrace of their misconduct is profound and shocking. Richard Nixon, against whom there is no conclusive evidence that he broke any laws (although a number of people in his entourage did) never did anything like this. J. Edgar Hoover in 47 years at the head of the FBI and its predecesso­r organizati­on, never tried to meddle in a presidenti­al election. Those responsibl­e will pay for this, including at the polls.

Without realizing the proportion­s of the emergency, America has survived the greatest constituti­onal crisis since the Civil War. All those who legitimate­ly oppose or dislike the president, including traditiona­l highbrow Republican­s who find him distastefu­l, should join in the condemnati­on of this largely criminal assault on democracy, and then, if they wish, go out and try to beat him fair and square, the good old-fashioned way, in a free election. But they must abide by the election’s result.

THOSE RESPONSIBL­E WILL PAY FOR THIS, INCLUDING AT THE POLLS.

 ?? EVAN VUCCI / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Those who legitimate­ly oppose or dislike the fact that Donald Trump occupies the White House should, if they wish, try to beat him in a free election, writes Conrad Black.
EVAN VUCCI / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Those who legitimate­ly oppose or dislike the fact that Donald Trump occupies the White House should, if they wish, try to beat him in a free election, writes Conrad Black.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada