National Post (National Edition)

Finding ‘opportunit­y’ in a pandemic?

- REX MURPHY

On Wednesday, Elizabeth May, the Green party’s parliament­ary leader, stated that, “Oil is dead,” and argued that, “The pandemic, in a very real way, as horrific as this is at many, many levels, gives us an opportunit­y to stop and think about how we get this economy back on its feet.”

Leaders in Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, China, Russia and Norway must have been shocked to hear the news. Imagine waking up on the other side of the world and hearing that the leader of a small Canadian political party declared that your energy industry is dead. I don’t know how to say “Elizabeth May has told us our oil industry is no more” in Norwegian, but I bet it sounds very sad.

Well, I’m here to relieve those statesmen, because May wasn’t talking about them. They are safe — always have been, always will be. As far as I can tell, May never chastises China, Russia or Qatar. When she said, “Oil is dead,” it was a verbal Exocet aimed straight at Alberta and its planet-destroying government. “Jason Kenney, your province is so over,” is how I paraphrase it.

But let us look at her other, in some ways more interestin­g, claim: that COVID-19 is an “opportunit­y.”

During a global pandemic that has seen hundreds of thousands of deaths, hundreds of thousands more mourning, economies wrecked and near universal anxiety, it is really difficult to craft a sentence in which COVID-19 swims in the same lexical waters as “opportunit­y.” Skip the rote demurrals — “as horrific as this is at many, many levels” — which function mainly as throat-clearing before getting to the main message.

One would have to scramble over a lot of other quite readily available terms — disaster, tragedy, calamity, plague, threat, misery, heartbreak — before settling on “opportunit­y” as a choice descriptio­n for a planetary epidemic. Well done, May.

The kernel of May’s declaratio­n is that COVID-19 can serve as a lever, political or otherwise, to finish off the Alberta oil industry. And that, by her green lights, is an opportunit­y. I suppose that if you hate the security and comforts of 21st-century civilizati­on that only energy underwrite­s, and if you despise the many miracles of our time — from medicine, to food, to communicat­ions — that energy has enabled, and if you ignore or deny the tremendous contributi­on that Albertan oil has made to the economy and workers of Canada … then you can, if you work at it, come to see COVID-19 as an “opportunit­y.”

Personally, I find it callous that anyone would use the current pandemic as a weapon in the perpetual green war against Alberta. But environmen­talists, as we all know, answer to a higher voice than the rest of us. There is nothing quite like the conviction that you are saving the world to leave you indifferen­t to the obviously lesser cares and concerns of others.

Though Abhijeet Manay, the deputy leader of the Green Party of Ontario, also tweeted this week that, “A post-COVID world has no place for the greedy, short-sighted & vicious societies that Big Oil creates,” it wasn’t exclusivel­y a Green pile-on. May’s perpetual end-ofthe-world mentality would be a cry from the fringe without an accompanyi­ng three cheers from the separatist­s.

The always vigilant CBC had the perfect headline: “May and Blanchet declare the oilpatch dead.” And they do make a congenial duo: Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet wishes to separate from Canada; and May wants to separate from reality. Blanchet spits on Alberta oil, but it still flows into Quebec. And if oil is really dead, shouldn’t someone stop those tankers from Saudi Arabia and Venezuela that drift into the Montreal harbour to stoke Quebec’s economy? Even separatist­s drive cars, and some even want to warm their homes with Western energy.

Alberta has kept Quebec a winner in the equalizati­on bingo game for decades. Quebec should, at the very least, have the good sense not to insult its benefactor­s. If it were not for “vicious” oil workers and the “dirty” oilsands, the streams of equalizati­on, and the dreams of separatism, would have dried up long ago.

The greatest chasm in Canadian politics is the gap between profession­al global warming activists and people who work for a living. Let us compare those who hate oil with those who produce it in terms of their contributi­on to Canada’s well-being.

There is the great number of people who leave their house every morning to put in an honest eight or 12 hours in a mine, oilfield or forest, and another set who tweet a lot, shuffle out grim press releases by the mile and stage gimmicky protests, all in an effort to stop the first bunch from having any work to go to. The hive of climate activists do nothing but sneer at those who keep the nation moving.

This latest battery from May reveals a cardinal element in the green world: environmen­talism is a species of snobbery. She knows what Albertans want, and they can hardly be trusted to know for themselves. The Greens prate and sing their virtuous hymns. They slam a carbon tax on the farmers and truck drivers during a plague, without a whisper of apology. They are spiteful of Canadian sources of oil, but silent on every other internatio­nal source. No wonder they find a bedfellow in a separatist leader.

How many jobs has Elizabeth May created? How many families have been fed by environmen­tal protests? How many poor Canadians were lifted out of the welfare trap because some smug spokesman for a cleaner world gave a press conference? How many Indigenous reserves are better off — their drinking water cleaner, their young people with better prospects — because the Sierra Club, Greenpeace or May’s Green party has been around? What, aside from unending, captious alarmism have they contribute­d to anyone other than their own specious cause?

Oil is dead; the pandemic is an opportunit­y to make sure it stays that way. The separatist leader and the Green leader are doing what they can to make Canada an easy place for some to think of leaving it. Alberta Premier Jason Kenney called their statements “divisive.” He was too kind. There are more vigorous words on call, but they do not belong in print.

HOW MANY JOBS HAS ELIZABETH MAY CREATED?

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada