National Post (National Edition)

We're doing stuff we couldn't even imagine seven years ago. If God did exist, he would invent this for us.

In genetics, you shut things down to find out what they do. COVID-19 has done the same to us

- — CHARLES BOONE, RESEARCHER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO. SCIENTISTS DISCOVER WHAT THINGS DO BY SHUTTING THEM DOWN, KIND OF LIKE THE PANDEMIC,

PAGE WP6

Alex Zimmer wakes up early when he wants to build a mutant. He needs to get to the lab before the lights come on. The lights are a signal. They tell the fish it's time to breed.

Zimmer, a post-doctoral fellow at University of Alberta, studies zebrafish. As creatures, they aren't much to look at, zebrafish. They're a few centimetre­s long. They have telltale blue-black and white stripes. But they're not striking. They don't jump through any hoops. “They're just plain fish,” said Marc Ekker, who also studies zebrafish, at University of Ottawa.

What zebrafish do have going for them is that they mature very quickly and they breed in big numbers. A female zebrafish can produce 200 eggs in a week. They're also cheap to raise and store. And on a genetic level, they're quite similar to humans.

That's part of what makes them such ideal candidates for genetic research. On the outside, they're small and wiggly. They smell like fish. They have gills and little fishy mouths. But strip them down to their genetic architectu­re and they aren't that different from you and me.

“Of course, there are sometimes slight difference­s,” Ekker said. “But very often it's the same. Nature did not reinvent the wheel many times.”

Zimmer builds zebrafish mutants, turning off their genes one by one, to study the uptake of salt in freshwater fish. Ekker has used them in his lab to isolate genes involved in childhood epilepsy and brain developmen­t. Others have used them to study everything from cell regenerati­on to cancer growth, drug toxicity and novel treatments for rare disease.

Zebrafish are what's known as a model species. They're one of four main models geneticist­s use to map out what specific genes do. “We just want to understand how you build an animal,” said Norbert Perrimon, a professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School.

Most research labs tend to specialize in one species or another. Charles Boone, at University of Toronto, is a yeast guy. Perrimon focuses on fruit flies. There are the fish people, the mouse community. But no matter the species, they're all doing some variation on the same thing: knocking out genes to find out what they do.

It's a research principle called “loss of function“and it underpins almost everything we know about the working lives of genes. “In fact, if loss of function studies did not exist, I don't know what we would be left with,” Perrimon said.

It's a simple idea at its core. To find out what something does, you shut it off and see what happens. That's what makes genetics the closest thing there is to a fairy tale science. It's all about imagining what life would be like if some tiny part of it were never there.

In flies, you can remove one gene and the wings won't grow. “You take away another one you may lose the eye,” Perrimon said. Depending on the study, scientists can shut off genes in living models or breed mutants in which specific genes never work. They can knock out genes one at a time or in combinatio­n. They can, with incredible precision, target one spot among thousands in a genome and flick it off like a light switch.

That kind of aim wasn't always possible. The earliest loss of function experiment­s were more scattersho­t. They relied on x-rays or chemical mutagens that shut down genes almost at random.

Today, most labs work with a technology called CRISPR-Cas9. It acts like a set of genetic scissors, snipping the genome at a precise point and preventing the cell from healing itself. CRISPR has changed everything about gene editing. “We're doing stuff we couldn't even imagine seven years ago,” Boone said. “If God did exist, he would invent this for us.”

Today, thanks to CRISPR, Boone can tell you which genes are essential for yeast to live (about 1,000 of them) and which ones it can survive without (the other 5,000). That ratio holds true for humans, too. You can shut off thousands of human genes, one at a time, and still have cellular life. Humans, in other words, can survive a lot of loss.

How that survival happens, though, is its own whole world of inquiry. In some cases, when one gene is shut down, others can compensate. Other genes, if lost, can cripple or change the organism in grand or granular ways. Some of the first loss-of-function experiment­s were on a fruit fly gene related to eye colour: turn it off and the fly's eyes went from red to white. Still other genes, once shut down, remain a mystery. Turn them off and the effect is there, but it remains unknown — a phantom loss that lingers unseen, inside.

I first learned about loss of function two years ago at a lunch at University of Toronto. I was so struck by the concept that I made a note of it in my phone.

“Loss of function: In science you learn what something does by shutting it down.”

I've been trying to write about loss of function ever since, but it was only recently that it struck me: loss of function is the perfect metaphor for the last six months of our lives.

The COVID-19 pandemic has taken away so many things from so many people. It forced us all to build mutant versions of the ways we live. Through lockdowns and lost friends, closed schools, isolated care homes and lonely deaths, we've learned what we can't survive without, what we can and at what cost. And we know now, in a way we never could before, what family means, what human touch means, what friendship­s and jobs and the chance to say goodbye all mean.

You shut things down to find out what they do, and along the way you learn what parts of yourself, and of your world, you need in order to stay alive.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada