National Post (National Edition)

Investor nerves tested as market themes unravel

- KATIE MARTIN

Markets are sliding and the main stories investors tell themselves to understand the world are disintegra­ting. Apart from that, the second quarter of the year is going just great.

The first of those stories, or “narratives” if you want to try to sound clever, is around the interest rate outlook. There, both policymake­rs and investors are putting their hands up and admitting they got this wrong. A run of upbeat inflation data means we are no longer likely to see the U.S. Federal Reserve cutting rates hard and fast, kicking one of the foundation­al pillars away from gains in risky asset prices.

This rather embarrassi­ng rethink on what is, after all, the biggest variable in determinin­g how stocks and bonds behave, matters a great deal. But it is not the only market pillar that is buckling, and feeding a four per cent decline in global stocks so far this month.

Another is the much-vaunted Magnificen­t Seven phenomenon, whereby a handful of supersized U.S. tech-focused companies, particular­ly those with a whiff of artificial intelligen­ce about them, have been holding up a whole lot of sky.

Together, Nvidia Corp., Meta Platforms Inc., Apple Inc., Tesla Inc., Amazon.com Inc., Alphabet Inc. and Microsoft Corp. have done a huge amount of the heavy lifting in pulling up the overall U.S. stock market — and even global stocks in recent months. They famously account for around a quarter of the value of the entire S&P 500 index of U.S. stocks. You could fit several European stock markets inside any one of them.

This has been a perfect theme for investors for almost a year. Catchy nickname? Check. Eye-popping numbers? Check. Gigantic returns for investors who got in before the latest sweep higher? Sure. If you bought stocks in chipmaker Nvidia at the start of this year, you are up a cool 70 per cent or so. Nice work if you can get it.

Plenty of other markets in Europe and Asia have much higher levels of concentrat­ion. But the vast size of these U.S. companies — Nvidia's market capitaliza­tion is around US$2 trillion — means they are often cited not just as a collection of stocks, but as a determinan­t of where other asset prices head, too.

The problem is that even Nvidia has come off the boil, despite posting blowout earnings figures earlier this year. From the high point in early March, the stock is down 12 per cent. Tesla shares are a horror show, down 40 per cent so far in 2024. Apple has shed 13 per cent. Microsoft is up “just” seven per cent or so — still extremely respectabl­e, of course, but it has cooled so far in April. Amazon is up 18 per cent and Meta has gained 42 per cent. Alphabet is up 12.

Inquiring minds have to ask whether the Magnificen­t Seven is a cohesive theme at all or just a handy moniker — even a joke that went too far, dreamt up by investment banks (probably) or journalist­s (no, definitely not).

New variants doing the rounds include the Fab Four or even the Terrific Two and Floppy Five. Never underestim­ate the propensity of the supposedly very-serious financial services industry to come up with this stuff. (It's worth stressing that, as we've pointed out before, the thing with the Magnificen­t Seven in the film that inspired the name is that four of the seven heroes are dead by the end.)

Fund managers now have to decide whether the latest downdraft in these stocks is something to fear or just a blip. Has the excitement around AI-flavoured stocks simply run ahead of itself? Does it make sense to reward the creators and early users of AI technology rather than stocks in health care, banking or whatever sectors are likely to be the long-term beneficiar­ies?

Yves Choueifaty, founder of French investment house Tobam SAS and a true believer in the power of portfolio diversific­ation, said the degree of market concentrat­ion embedded in these stocks is unhealthy.

“The Magnificen­t Seven are simultaneo­usly the most overowned and most underweigh­t stocks in the U.S.,” he said. “Everybody knows this concentrat­ion is not sustainabl­e over the long term, but it can still continue for a few months or even a couple of years.”

But a new note from HSBC Holdings PLC suggests this trend may be just getting going.

“To truly understand how dominant they have been, consider that only five per cent of the market — around 25 stocks — has delivered stronger returns on a year-on-year basis,” global equity strategist Alastair Pinder said in the note.

But “the real surprise” is that the bank's survey of 150 of the largest U.S. funds shows “nearly every U.S. fund manager is underweigh­t these stocks collective­ly” due to restrictio­ns for some types of funds on single-stock concentrat­ion.

“All of the Magnificen­t Seven rank in the top 10 largest fund underweigh­ts relative to the benchmark,” Pinder said, with Apple top of the pile. “One could argue that the Magnificen­t Seven are simultaneo­usly the most overowned and most underweigh­t stocks in the U.S.”

Some big mutual fund managers have already started reclassify­ing funds to free them from position limits. HSBC says this is likely to continue and could push further investment in the direction of this group — although one imagines some will now steer clear of Tesla.

The mood among fund managers still appears to be an inclinatio­n to buy dips, and this is the first dip in key stock indexes that we have seen for some months. It's a test of nerve nonetheles­s, with few guiding lights to rely on.

 ?? BRYAN R. SMITH / AFP / GETTY IMAGES ?? Fund managers have to decide whether the latest downdraft in the much-vaunted Magnificen­t Seven — the name
given to a collection of U.S. tech-focused companies — is something to fear or just a blip, Katie Martin writes.
BRYAN R. SMITH / AFP / GETTY IMAGES Fund managers have to decide whether the latest downdraft in the much-vaunted Magnificen­t Seven — the name given to a collection of U.S. tech-focused companies — is something to fear or just a blip, Katie Martin writes.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada