House of Commons does not need protection of the RCMP
The government should think twice before implementing its knee-jerk impulse to install the RCMP in charge of security within the confines of the Parliamentary precincts.
I refer to the shooting incident on Oct. 22, 2014, when I point out the perpetrator, Michael ZehafBibeau, was able to run his car uninterrupted by the RCMP and entered the Centre Block armed with a rifle and was challenged by an unarmed security constable who received a wound to his leg for his heroic act.
This surely demonstrates the alertness of security within the precinct.
The public should be aware that security personnel are trained to recognize every MP by sight and on a daily basis deal with — and be familiar with — their staff and other employees. Furthermore, they know every nook and cranny in the buildings, from basements to rooftops. This knowledge enhances their ability to protect all within.
The same can be said for the Senate security. I can say from personal experience there is a special feeling among members, employees and security personnel, which reflects a sort of family affair or “esprit de corps” that is comforting to all. It should also be mentioned that the Commissioner of the RCMP has spoken with high praise for the security service.
In my opinion, I believe the Speaker of the House should remain in full charge and along with the Sergeant-at-Arms continue to direct the security within the precincts of Parliament. F.E. (Tex) Morris, Carleton Place, former Detective Sergeant, Security Service, House of Commons (retired)