Ottawa Citizen

Father should consider his behaviour: readers

- ELLIE TESHER Read Ellie Monday to Saturday. ellie@thestar.ca @ellieadvic­e

Dear Readers: There’s been much feedback regarding the father whose university-age daughters cut contact with him. He fears his daughter, 9, will follow, due to their mother’s “brainwashi­ng”:

Reader No. 1: There are things missing in his story. He’s been legally separated for a year, but (why did) his two older children cut contact with him four years ago, and visitation of his youngest is only by verbal agreement?

As a father myself, with three sets of children from three marriages, I realize I was not the best husband. But despite attempts by the mothers, the bond with my children was unbreakabl­e.

Most fathers I know only try to make that strong bond after divorce, not before.

But kids are now and your relationsh­ip with them as adults depends on your relationsh­ip with them as children.

Reader No. 2: I’m disturbed when I hear parents assuming that their child has been “brainwashe­d” by their ex-spouse.

Especially in the instance of adult children, as mentioned here, I think they deserve more credit than that. If this father wants to pursue a renewed relationsh­ip with his adult daughters, he should take an objective look at himself and ask why they might’ve made that decision (to end contact).

I doubt their arms would be wide open to someone who thinks they’ve been brainwashe­d and that their decisions/opinions aren’t their own. Reader No. 3: I agree with your advice that children be told that the separation/divorce is not about the children, nor changes the parents’ love for the children.

However, as children get older, they may come to understand that one of the parents did act without regard for the impact on their children then, or later on. And that one parent’s actions did have ill effects for the child and perhaps for the other parent, too.

I’ve known a man who while still married to the mother of his child, met online and married a second woman in China — technicall­y, it was bigamy.

His first wife eventually found out and left him.

To this day, he continues to deny he was legally married to EITHER wife, despite overwhelmi­ng publicly available evidence to the contrary.

He loves his child, and labels the increasing distance from the child “parental alienation” by the mother, rather than taking responsibi­lity for how this hurt the child (now a young adult).

I believe the child isn’t wrong to wonder why the father cannot see how much this hurt, no matter how hard the mother may provide a balanced view of events.

His first marriage may’ve been bad and leaving it may’ve been for the best, but how he did it and his denial of it seems callous of the feelings of others.

Reader No. 4: The lesson here is that not only must one constantly reassure the child of divorce of being loved regardless of what happened, but also work to see the hurt the breakup did to the child, and accept responsibi­lity for any part they played (perhaps unintentio­nally) hurting them.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada