Ottawa Citizen

What if it happens to you? Passenger rights advocate spells out what you can do

- OLIVIA BLACKMORE

Airline passenger rights advocate Gabor Lukacs says air travellers have many rights when things go wrong, but the rules governing those rights just aren’t being enforced.

When an airline seeks permission to operate internatio­nally, it creates a document known as a tariff, Lukacs says.

The tariff addresses a wealth of issues relating to the airline and passengers that “are not merely recommenda­tions.”

“These are binding. Whatever is in the tariff is very much legally binding on the airline,” the Halifaxbas­ed Lukacs says, adding that it is the Canadian Transporta­tion Agency that is charged with enforcing those rights.

The federal agency has launched an inquiry into why passengers were forced to spend hours on two Air Transat jets that were diverted to Ottawa last week from Montreal because of severe weather.

Passengers spent six hours trapped aboard one plane on the tarmac and several passengers called 911 after the plane ran out of drinking water and fuel, leaving it without air conditioni­ng. One person was treated on the plane and passengers were given bottled water.

The Citizen spoke to Lukacs about what passengers can do if they are in a similar situation.

Q: Is 90 minutes the minimum amount of time that a passenger has to wait before they can ask to leave the aircraft?

A: Yes. (According to Air Transat’s tariff: “If the delay exceeds 90 minutes and if the aircraft commander permits, the Carrier will offer passengers the option of disembarki­ng until it is time to depart.”)

Q: In situations such as last week’s, what can passengers do? Should they call 911?

A: Absolutely, yes. I think that was a very good idea and I would encourage passengers to do that in the future. The airline has no right whatsoever to keep you confined to the aircraft for that long, and if you want to disembark, also make sure that (you) tell the airline that you would like to disembark and pull out a copy of the airline’s terms and conditions and politely and respectful­ly show it to the airline employees. Advise them that if they are not going to let you off that you will be calling 911.

Q: Should passengers also be tweeting for help?

A: Absolutely. Social media was very important here. I would also suggest taking out your cellphones and begin to record. Even if airline employees tell you cannot, keep recording. Don’t worry about it. You do have the right to record, especially when you are in a dire situation. Don’t let the airline get away with it.

Q: What should passengers do after they have experience­d an incident like this one?

A: When something like this happens, take the airline to court after the incident. Make sure that it costs the airline money to do what they have done to you.

Q : Why take the airline to court after an incident?

A: Airlines are not going to change their behaviour just because it’s the right thing to do. We live in a world where airlines will change course if the financial cost of following a different course or staying on a current course is too high. With litigation you can make sure that there is a public image cost to the airline, there is a financial cost for litigation, and there is potentiall­y a risk for a bad case law for the airline. When you combine all of this, it’s important to attach a price tag for not following the rules.

Q: Would passengers stranded in Ottawa be entitled to monetary compensati­on for being kept for hours sitting in the plane?

A: There are two separate issues for which passengers can and should seek compensati­on from Air Transat. The first is the delay. The flight’s destinatio­n was Montreal, but it departed from within the EU. Since the delay was over three hours, Air Transat owes monetary compensati­on (in cash, not vouchers), and since the delay was over four hours on a transatlan­tic flight, Air Transat owes 600 euros per passenger — again, in cash. Secondly, there’s breach of contract for being confined to the aircraft for a long time. The amount of compensati­on would have to be determined by a court. But I suspect that a Quebec small claims court judge would award at least $1,000 per passenger for this — possibly more.

More informatio­n is available at airpasseng­errights.ca. oblackmore@postmedia.com twitter.com/olivia_blckmr

 ?? THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES ?? Airlines can’t force passengers to remain in the aircraft if they are stuck on the tarmac for more than 90 minutes. A passengers’ rights advocate says airlines must pay when they ignore the rules.
THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES Airlines can’t force passengers to remain in the aircraft if they are stuck on the tarmac for more than 90 minutes. A passengers’ rights advocate says airlines must pay when they ignore the rules.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada