Ottawa Citizen

The fears of a clown

Pennywise’s scare tactics get tired and repetitive

- TINA HASSANNIA

The latest adaptation of Stephen King’s 1986 novel about Pennywise, the creepy clown who feeds on children by inducing them to hallucinat­e their worst fears, was not an easy movie to make. The novel interlaces two narratives set in different time periods; its setting, the town of Derry, is awash in deep geographic­al lore, and infamously, its monster is a clown.

That’s an archetype difficult to render scary instead of silly, but Bill Skarsgård and his loony, lilting voice do a pretty decent job of following up Tim Curry’s exceptiona­lly creepy interpreta­tion of Pennywise in the 1990 TV adaptation.

While most King fans have been preoccupie­d with the film’s treatment of Pennywise, few have raised concerns about the representa­tion of Beverly Marsh (Sophia Lillis), the sole girl among the 11-year-old protagonis­ts. The sweet-faced tomboy is the most courageous character in the self-proclaimed Losers Club. The book wasn’t particular­ly kind to Beverly, though that’s emblematic of King’s treatment of women characters (which he changed to some success in the 1990s).

It splits the cross-cutting narrative into two separate chapters (the second film comes out next year). The kids’ respective fears have also been altered to be loosely based on some aspect of their marginaliz­ation.

Half of the audience will immediatel­y recognize Beverly’s fear: burgeoning womanhood. Her first encounter with the clown’s dark magic is in the bathroom, when large tentacle strings of hair and muck and grossness grab her before spewing and drenching the bathroom with blood. It’s one of the film’s most shocking scenes, and becomes creepy when Beverly’s lecherous, bewildered father Alvin (Stephen Bogaert) claims he doesn’t see blood (her friends do, and help clean up).

This is one of the few good Beverly scenes in the book and movie. Her fear grows as her own body changes, and in the face of increasing­ly lewd and overprotec­tive comments made by her father.

The movie hints if Alvin isn’t already sexually abusive, he soon will be. But the 2017 adaptation of It struggles to make sense of Beverly’s particular­ly gendered fears in one near-rape scene. She successful­ly thwarts her dad’s attack — it’s an important moment to champion, given the graveness of the situation.

But instead of being empowering or cathartic, the movie then inserts a sudden appearance of Pennywise to scare Beverly some more.

The rest of the film’s scary scenes might not be as problemati­c but they are increasing­ly less effective over the course of the film. It opens with the muchpromot­ed scene of a young boy lured by Pennywise into a sewer entrance. It’s a well-crafted introducti­on, atmospheri­c in its use of rain, and memorable in the use of childhood iconograph­y (a yellow raincoat and paper boat). You can feel the writers’ strain to make Pennywise’s subsequent turns as effective.

The variety of the kids’ scary hallucinat­ions — wooden doll clowns, burning hands, a zombielike leper — isn’t enough to keep multiple scare scenes in a row from feeling arduously repetitive. It works best exploring the comedic, playful and tightly knit dynamic between the boys — Finn Wolfhard and Jaeden Lieberher are especially notable in their respective roles as Richie and Bill — proving that King’s strength really lies in depicting boys’ clubs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada